Uncertainty Modeling for Plane and Line Features to Improve Consistency in RTK/INS/LiDAR Integrated Navigation

The demand for high-precision navigation and positioning is growing rapidly with the advancements in autonomous driving and intelligent robotics. Nowadays, many studies have been conducted on the fusion of the global navigation satellite system (GNSS), inertial navigation systems (INS), and light detection and ranging (LiDAR) because of their complementary characteristics. Notably, in multi-source fusion, it is crucial to precisely model the uncertainty (covariance) of each sensor. While GNSS and IMU covariance modeling are mature, LiDAR covariance modeling remains unsophisticated, resulting in a suboptimal fusion of GNSS/INS/LiDAR. In this work, the LiDAR covariance modeling method is proposed, including the original point cloud covariance, the localmap covariance, and the observation covariance modeling. A point cloud selecting approach based on the eigenvectors and centroids is also introduced to maintain valid surface and edge feature points, thereby reducing repeated observations. These above methods are applied to the tightly coupled RTK/INS/LiDAR_PPL (G+I+PPL) system based on the Multi-State Constraint Kalman Filter (MSCKF) to further improve positioning accuracy and covariance consistency. The experimental results show that the proposed method has better covariance consistency in comparison to LIOSAM and FASTLIO. Meanwhile, G+I+PPL with fused point-to-plane/line (PPL) observations outperforms compared to RTK/INS (G+I) and RTK/INS/LiDAR_CP (G+I+CP) using closest point (CP) observations, in the right, front, and up (RFU) directions, demonstrating a positioning improvement in performance by (50.7%, 58.6%, 54.3%) and (46.2%, 55.0%, 58.8%), respectively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
Published
2024-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/tits.2024.3474093
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Target Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.74

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uncertainty Modeling for Plane and Line Features to Improve Consistency in RTK/INS/LiDAR Integrated Navigation

Feng Zhu, Xiaohong Zhang, Fei Guo, Zhuo Xu et al.
5 citations
IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
Target Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
1.74
article

Uncertainty Modeling for Plane and Line Features to Improve Consistency in RTK/INS/LiDAR Integrated Navigation

Feng Zhu, Xiaohong Zhang, Fei Guo, Zhuo Xu, Yuantai Zhang, T Xiao, Jiarui Lv
article en
5 citations

Abstract

The demand for high-precision navigation and positioning is growing rapidly with the advancements in autonomous driving and intelligent robotics. Nowadays, many studies have been conducted on the fusion of the global navigation satellite system (GNSS), inertial navigation systems (INS), and light detection and ranging (LiDAR) because of their complementary characteristics. Notably, in multi-source fusion, it is crucial to precisely model the uncertainty (covariance) of each sensor. While GNSS and IMU covariance modeling are mature, LiDAR covariance modeling remains unsophisticated, resulting in a suboptimal fusion of GNSS/INS/LiDAR. In this work, the LiDAR covariance modeling method is proposed, including the original point cloud covariance, the localmap covariance, and the observation covariance modeling. A point cloud selecting approach based on the eigenvectors and centroids is also introduced to maintain valid surface and edge feature points, thereby reducing repeated observations. These above methods are applied to the tightly coupled RTK/INS/LiDAR_PPL (G+I+PPL) system based on the Multi-State Constraint Kalman Filter (MSCKF) to further improve positioning accuracy and covariance consistency. The experimental results show that the proposed method has better covariance consistency in comparison to LIOSAM and FASTLIO. Meanwhile, G+I+PPL with fused point-to-plane/line (PPL) observations outperforms compared to RTK/INS (G+I) and RTK/INS/LiDAR_CP (G+I+CP) using closest point (CP) observations, in the right, front, and up (RFU) directions, demonstrating a positioning improvement in performance by (50.7%, 58.6%, 54.3%) and (46.2%, 55.0%, 58.8%), respectively.

IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation SystemsVol. 25(12)
Wuhan University (CN), Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Target Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
1.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.