Combining experiment and ethnoarchaeology to differentiate the surface conditions of animal hides

There is a wide range of technical processes involved in working animal skins, depending on the environment, the size of the skins and the purpose of the work (clothing, tent covers, etc.). The archaeological tools and their shape, weight, and use-wear are often the only evidence of these technical processes. Their understanding requires an experimental approach combined with ethnoarchaeological data to establish protocols allowing processes compatible with the type of skin to be treated and carry out the correct gestures at each stage of the process. This study, dedicated to the processing of very large hides, presents the experimental replication of the production process of moose hides observed in Canada (B.C.) in an Athaspakan group. The functional analysis of the experimental tools allows identifying different wear patterns corresponding to different surface conditions of animal hides; each of them having particular implications for the interpretation of the archaeological record.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sprawozdania Archeologiczne
Published
2024-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23858/sa/76.2024.1.3624
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Combining experiment and ethnoarchaeology to differentiate the surface conditions of animal hides

Eugénie Gauvrit Roux, Cristina De Stefanis, Sylvie Beyriès
1 citations
Sprawozdania Archeologiczne
Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
3.72
article

Combining experiment and ethnoarchaeology to differentiate the surface conditions of animal hides

Eugénie Gauvrit Roux, Cristina De Stefanis, Sylvie Beyriès
article en
1 citations

Abstract

There is a wide range of technical processes involved in working animal skins, depending on the environment, the size of the skins and the purpose of the work (clothing, tent covers, etc.). The archaeological tools and their shape, weight, and use-wear are often the only evidence of these technical processes. Their understanding requires an experimental approach combined with ethnoarchaeological data to establish protocols allowing processes compatible with the type of skin to be treated and carry out the correct gestures at each stage of the process. This study, dedicated to the processing of very large hides, presents the experimental replication of the production process of moose hides observed in Canada (B.C.) in an Athaspakan group. The functional analysis of the experimental tools allows identifying different wear patterns corresponding to different surface conditions of animal hides; each of them having particular implications for the interpretation of the archaeological record.

Sprawozdania ArcheologiczneVol. 76(1)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université Côte d'Azur (FR), Géosciences Rennes (FR), Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur (FR), Cultures et Environnements. Préhistoire, Antiquité, Moyen Âge (FR), Centre de Recherche en Archéologie, Archéosciences, Histoire (FR), Université de Rennes (FR), Nantes Université (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
3.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.