Measuring Career Aspirations in Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics and Education

Abstract There has been a sustained interest in student perceptions about STEM fields and their choice of careers over the past few decades. Research has shown that there is a decline in students pursuing STEM careers, and this has raised global concern. Despite these issues, no unistructural, broad, parsimonious and unambiguous quantitative instrument exists to probe student career aspirations. This paper highlights the background, extension and validation of an instrument, derived from a previous science-focussed high-quality instrument that allows student career aspirations to be quantitatively characterised. Participants were 1221 undergraduate students, 1003 of whom were judged to have provided good data, from 18 tertiary institutions in the USA and Canada. The resultant instrument is a reliable 20-question survey representing five clearly demarcated domains: Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics and Education. Each scale possesses high reliability (Cronbach’s alpha > 0.95), and high construct validity as determined by comparisons with their stated choices of career.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal for STEM Education Research
Published
2024-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-024-00134-z
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Career Development and Diversity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.05

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring Career Aspirations in Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics and Education

D. Reichart, David McKinnon, Michael Fitzgerald, Saeed Salimpour et al.
2 citations
Journal for STEM Education Research
Career Development and Diversity
1.05
article

Measuring Career Aspirations in Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics and Education

D. Reichart, David McKinnon, Michael Fitzgerald, Saeed Salimpour, Rachel Freed
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract There has been a sustained interest in student perceptions about STEM fields and their choice of careers over the past few decades. Research has shown that there is a decline in students pursuing STEM careers, and this has raised global concern. Despite these issues, no unistructural, broad, parsimonious and unambiguous quantitative instrument exists to probe student career aspirations. This paper highlights the background, extension and validation of an instrument, derived from a previous science-focussed high-quality instrument that allows student career aspirations to be quantitatively characterised. Participants were 1221 undergraduate students, 1003 of whom were judged to have provided good data, from 18 tertiary institutions in the USA and Canada. The resultant instrument is a reliable 20-question survey representing five clearly demarcated domains: Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics and Education. Each scale possesses high reliability (Cronbach’s alpha > 0.95), and high construct validity as determined by comparisons with their stated choices of career.

Journal for STEM Education ResearchVol. 8(1)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Edith Cowan University (AU), Las Cumbres Observatory Global Telescope Network (US), Deakin University (AU), Charles Sturt University (AU), Max Planck Institute for Astronomy (DE)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Defense, Deakin University
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Career Development and Diversity
1.05
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.