FEM-driven machine learning approach for characterizing stress magnitude, peak temperature and weld zone deformation in ultrasonic welding of metallic multilayers: application to battery cells

Abstract This study investigates the innovative application of machine learning (ML) models to predict critical parameters—stress magnitude (SM), peak temperature (PT), and plastic strain (PS)—in ultrasonic welding of metallic multilayers. Extensive numerical simulations were employed to develop and evaluate three ML models: Radial Basis Function (RBF), Random Forest (RF), and Kernel Ridge Regression (KRR). According to the results, the KRR model demonstrated superior performance, achieving the lowest RMSE and highest R 2 values of 0.068 ( R 2 = 0.941) for SM, 0.075 ( R 2 = 0.929) for PT, and 0.071 ( R 2 = 0.946) for PS, with fewer data samples required. KRR also exhibited low squared bias and variance values, ranging from <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mo>×</mml:mo> <mml:mrow> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>4</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>3.2</mml:mn> <mml:mo>×</mml:mo> <mml:mrow> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>4</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> for bias and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mstyle scriptlevel="0"/> <mml:mn>2.2</mml:mn> <mml:mo>×</mml:mo> <mml:mrow> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>4</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>3.6</mml:mn> <mml:mo>×</mml:mo> <mml:mrow> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>4</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> for variance, indicating its precision in predicting the output targets. Moreover, the systematic categorization of input features, including material properties, geometrical factors, and welding parameters, highlighted their significant influence on predictive accuracy, particularly the crucial role of welding parameters at higher output values. Finally, a case study on ultrasonic welding of copper multilayers underscores the model’s effectiveness in unraveling complex relationships, providing a robust tool for optimizing and advancing ultrasonic welding processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering
Published
2024-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-651x/ad8669
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

FEM-driven machine learning approach for characterizing stress magnitude, peak temperature and weld zone deformation in ultrasonic welding of metallic multilayers: application to battery cells

Feras Mohammed Al-Matarneh
3 citations
Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering
Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis
0.64
article

FEM-driven machine learning approach for characterizing stress magnitude, peak temperature and weld zone deformation in ultrasonic welding of metallic multilayers: application to battery cells

Feras Mohammed Al-Matarneh
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study investigates the innovative application of machine learning (ML) models to predict critical parameters—stress magnitude (SM), peak temperature (PT), and plastic strain (PS)—in ultrasonic welding of metallic multilayers. Extensive numerical simulations were employed to develop and evaluate three ML models: Radial Basis Function (RBF), Random Forest (RF), and Kernel Ridge Regression (KRR). According to the results, the KRR model demonstrated superior performance, achieving the lowest RMSE and highest R 2 values of 0.068 ( R 2 = 0.941) for SM, 0.075 ( R 2 = 0.929) for PT, and 0.071 ( R 2 = 0.946) for PS, with fewer data samples required. KRR also exhibited low squared bias and variance values, ranging from <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> <mml:mo>×</mml:mo> <mml:mrow> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>4</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>3.2</mml:mn> <mml:mo>×</mml:mo> <mml:mrow> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>4</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> for bias and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mstyle scriptlevel="0"/> <mml:mn>2.2</mml:mn> <mml:mo>×</mml:mo> <mml:mrow> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>4</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>3.6</mml:mn> <mml:mo>×</mml:mo> <mml:mrow> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>4</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> for variance, indicating its precision in predicting the output targets. Moreover, the systematic categorization of input features, including material properties, geometrical factors, and welding parameters, highlighted their significant influence on predictive accuracy, particularly the crucial role of welding parameters at higher output values. Finally, a case study on ultrasonic welding of copper multilayers underscores the model’s effectiveness in unraveling complex relationships, providing a robust tool for optimizing and advancing ultrasonic welding processes.

Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and EngineeringVol. 32(8)
University of Tabuk (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis
0.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.