Fine‐scale variation in the medium and large‐sized mammal assemblage composition in northeastern Amazon: Drivers of β‐diversity and species interactions

Abstract Understanding fine‐scale assemblage composition patterns of mammals is important to increase ecological knowledge and support conservation actions. We investigated whether β‐diversity of medium and large‐sized mammals and its components (replacement and richness difference) are related to distance to major rivers, height above the nearest drainage (HAND), and vegetation height; and whether species interactions shape their spatiotemporal distribution. We used camera traps to monitor the mammal assemblage of the Tumucumaque Mountains National Park, Northeastern Amazon. The difference (Δ) in distance to major rivers and geographic distance between sites affected positively the total β‐diversity and both its components. ΔVegetation height affected total β‐diversity and species replacement, while ΔHAND affected richness differences, and to a lower extent, species replacement. We found evidence that spotted pacas ( Cuniculus paca ) and ocelots ( Leopardus pardalis ) adjust their spatiotemporal dynamics to escape from predation and to overlap with abundant prey, respectively. However, we did not find evidence that competition affects the spatiotemporal distribution of any other species. Vegetation height, distance to rivers and HAND influenced mammal assemblages probably through shaping the quality and amount of resources. Predation risk seems to be important in shaping the use of time and space by prey, while the distribution of prey is important for the use of time and space for predators. Furthermore, other niche differentiation mechanisms may explain why competition did not affect the species' spatiotemporal dynamics. We highlight the need to include different environmental contexts within protected areas to promote mammal diversity and conservation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Research
Published
2024-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1703.12534
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fine‐scale variation in the medium and large‐sized mammal assemblage composition in northeastern Amazon: Drivers of β‐diversity and species interactions

Cláudia Regina da Silva, William Douglas de Carvalho, Luís Miguel Rosalino, Fernanda Colares Brandão et al.
Ecological Research
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
article

Fine‐scale variation in the medium and large‐sized mammal assemblage composition in northeastern Amazon: Drivers of β‐diversity and species interactions

Cláudia Regina da Silva, William Douglas de Carvalho, Luís Miguel Rosalino, Fernanda Colares Brandão, Renato Richard Hilário, Herbert O. B. Duarte
article en

Abstract

Abstract Understanding fine‐scale assemblage composition patterns of mammals is important to increase ecological knowledge and support conservation actions. We investigated whether β‐diversity of medium and large‐sized mammals and its components (replacement and richness difference) are related to distance to major rivers, height above the nearest drainage (HAND), and vegetation height; and whether species interactions shape their spatiotemporal distribution. We used camera traps to monitor the mammal assemblage of the Tumucumaque Mountains National Park, Northeastern Amazon. The difference (Δ) in distance to major rivers and geographic distance between sites affected positively the total β‐diversity and both its components. ΔVegetation height affected total β‐diversity and species replacement, while ΔHAND affected richness differences, and to a lower extent, species replacement. We found evidence that spotted pacas ( Cuniculus paca ) and ocelots ( Leopardus pardalis ) adjust their spatiotemporal dynamics to escape from predation and to overlap with abundant prey, respectively. However, we did not find evidence that competition affects the spatiotemporal distribution of any other species. Vegetation height, distance to rivers and HAND influenced mammal assemblages probably through shaping the quality and amount of resources. Predation risk seems to be important in shaping the use of time and space by prey, while the distribution of prey is important for the use of time and space for predators. Furthermore, other niche differentiation mechanisms may explain why competition did not affect the species' spatiotemporal dynamics. We highlight the need to include different environmental contexts within protected areas to promote mammal diversity and conservation.

Ecological ResearchVol. 40(4)
University of Lisbon (PT), Universidade Federal do Amapá (BR), Instituto de Pesquisas Tecnológicas (BR), Universidade Estadual do Amapá (BR), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (ES)
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.