Analysis of Failed Posterior Fossa Decompression and an Effective Revision Surgery in Patients with Basilar Invagination and Atlantoaxial Dislocation

Objective The objective of this study was to analyze failed posterior fossa decompression (PFD) in patients with basilar invagination and atlantoaxial dislocation (BI‐AAD). Revision surgery in these patients is challenging and has been rarely reported. In addition, the anatomical variations of the vertebral artery increase the risk of revision surgery. Here, we introduce the implementation of a new type of one‐stage posterior revision surgery, whose difficulties and effects are summarized. Methods A total of 21 patients with BI‐AAD who underwent PFD were retrospectively analyzed in our center from November 2017 to April 2021. The revision surgery in all patients was performed through the posterior approach. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and the Short Term 12 (SF‐12) score were employed to evaluate the clinical symptoms and health status. The distance from the tip of the odontoid to Chamberlain's line (DCL), the atlantodental interval (ADI), the clivus‐canal angle (CCA), the diameter of the subarachnoid space (DSS), and the craniovertebral junction triangular area (CTA) were assessed radiographically. The pre‐ and postoperative results were compared by paired t test. Results The data of 21 consecutive patients were reviewed, with an average follow‐up period of 28 ± 14 months. Postoperative imaging showed effectively reduced compression of BI‐AAD. No implant failure or neurovascular injury occurred. Eleven patients had vertebral artery abnormalities, but none had vertebral artery injury. All patients had evidence of bone fusion on the CT scan images within a 12‐month follow‐up period. The JOA and SF‐12 scores were significantly improved 1 year postoperatively ( p < 0.001). Conclusion Posterior surgery using the technique of interarticular distraction, fusion with cage grafting, and fixation is a safe and effective revision surgery to treat patients with basilar invagination and atlantoaxial dislocation who failed PFD, which will result in good outcome.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Orthopaedic Surgery
Published
2024-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/os.14252
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of Failed Posterior Fossa Decompression and an Effective Revision Surgery in Patients with Basilar Invagination and Atlantoaxial Dislocation

Maoyang Qi, Zan Chen, Yueqi Du, Wanru Duan et al.
2 citations
Orthopaedic Surgery
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
1.15
article

Analysis of Failed Posterior Fossa Decompression and an Effective Revision Surgery in Patients with Basilar Invagination and Atlantoaxial Dislocation

Maoyang Qi, Zan Chen, Yueqi Du, Wanru Duan, Fengzeng Jian, Zhenlei Liu, Can Zhang, Jian Guan, Boyan Zhang, Xin Zong, Zuowei Wang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Objective The objective of this study was to analyze failed posterior fossa decompression (PFD) in patients with basilar invagination and atlantoaxial dislocation (BI‐AAD). Revision surgery in these patients is challenging and has been rarely reported. In addition, the anatomical variations of the vertebral artery increase the risk of revision surgery. Here, we introduce the implementation of a new type of one‐stage posterior revision surgery, whose difficulties and effects are summarized. Methods A total of 21 patients with BI‐AAD who underwent PFD were retrospectively analyzed in our center from November 2017 to April 2021. The revision surgery in all patients was performed through the posterior approach. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and the Short Term 12 (SF‐12) score were employed to evaluate the clinical symptoms and health status. The distance from the tip of the odontoid to Chamberlain's line (DCL), the atlantodental interval (ADI), the clivus‐canal angle (CCA), the diameter of the subarachnoid space (DSS), and the craniovertebral junction triangular area (CTA) were assessed radiographically. The pre‐ and postoperative results were compared by paired t test. Results The data of 21 consecutive patients were reviewed, with an average follow‐up period of 28 ± 14 months. Postoperative imaging showed effectively reduced compression of BI‐AAD. No implant failure or neurovascular injury occurred. Eleven patients had vertebral artery abnormalities, but none had vertebral artery injury. All patients had evidence of bone fusion on the CT scan images within a 12‐month follow‐up period. The JOA and SF‐12 scores were significantly improved 1 year postoperatively ( p < 0.001). Conclusion Posterior surgery using the technique of interarticular distraction, fusion with cage grafting, and fixation is a safe and effective revision surgery to treat patients with basilar invagination and atlantoaxial dislocation who failed PFD, which will result in good outcome.

Orthopaedic SurgeryVol. 16(12)
Capital Medical University (CN)
National Key Research and Development Program of China
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.