Metabolomics of related C3 and C4 Flaveria species indicate differences in the operation of photorespiration under fluctuating light

C<sub>3</sub> photosynthesis can be complemented with a C<sub>4</sub> carbon concentrating mechanism (CCM) to minimize photorespiratory losses. C<sub>4</sub> photosynthesis is often more efficient than C<sub>3</sub> under steady-state conditions. However, the C<sub>4</sub> CCM depends on inter-cellular metabolite concentration gradients, which must increase following increases in light intensity and could decrease rates of C<sub>4</sub> photosynthesis under fluctuating light. Additionally, incomplete flux through photorespiration could prove beneficial to C<sub>4</sub> assimilation during light induction of the CCM. Here, we compare metabolic profiles in the closely related C<sub>3</sub> <i>Flaveria robusta</i> and C<sub>4</sub> <i>Flaveria bidentis</i> during a light transient from low to high light to determine if these non-steady state accumulation patterns provide insight to the induction of the metabolite gradients needed to drive C4 intermediate transport and if there is incomplete cycling of photorespiratory intermediates. In these C<sub>3</sub> and C<sub>4</sub> species, metabolite steady-state pool sizes suggest that C<sub>4</sub> transport acids maintain concentration gradients across the bundle sheath and mesophyll cell types under these light fluctuations. However, there was incomplete flux through photorespiration in the C<sub>4</sub> <i>F. bidentis</i>, which could reduce photorespiratory CO<sub>2</sub> loss via glycine decarboxylation and help maintain higher rates of assimilation during following induction periods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plant Direct
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pld3.70012
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.47

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Metabolomics of related C3 and C4 Flaveria species indicate differences in the operation of photorespiration under fluctuating light

Kaila Smith, Berkley J. Walker, Andreas P.M. Weber, Urte Schlüter et al.
2 citations
Plant Direct
Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
0.47
article

Metabolomics of related C3 and C4 Flaveria species indicate differences in the operation of photorespiration under fluctuating light

Kaila Smith, Berkley J. Walker, Andreas P.M. Weber, Urte Schlüter, Xinyu Fu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

C<sub>3</sub> photosynthesis can be complemented with a C<sub>4</sub> carbon concentrating mechanism (CCM) to minimize photorespiratory losses. C<sub>4</sub> photosynthesis is often more efficient than C<sub>3</sub> under steady-state conditions. However, the C<sub>4</sub> CCM depends on inter-cellular metabolite concentration gradients, which must increase following increases in light intensity and could decrease rates of C<sub>4</sub> photosynthesis under fluctuating light. Additionally, incomplete flux through photorespiration could prove beneficial to C<sub>4</sub> assimilation during light induction of the CCM. Here, we compare metabolic profiles in the closely related C<sub>3</sub> <i>Flaveria robusta</i> and C<sub>4</sub> <i>Flaveria bidentis</i> during a light transient from low to high light to determine if these non-steady state accumulation patterns provide insight to the induction of the metabolite gradients needed to drive C4 intermediate transport and if there is incomplete cycling of photorespiratory intermediates. In these C<sub>3</sub> and C<sub>4</sub> species, metabolite steady-state pool sizes suggest that C<sub>4</sub> transport acids maintain concentration gradients across the bundle sheath and mesophyll cell types under these light fluctuations. However, there was incomplete flux through photorespiration in the C<sub>4</sub> <i>F. bidentis</i>, which could reduce photorespiratory CO<sub>2</sub> loss via glycine decarboxylation and help maintain higher rates of assimilation during following induction periods.

Plant DirectVol. 8(10)
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE), Michigan State University (US)
U.S. Department of Energy, Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung, Michigan State University, European Commission, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Office of Science, College of Engineering, Michigan State University, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme, Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center, Basic Energy Sciences, Biological and Environmental Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
0.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.