Estimation of the muscle force by perineural intramuscular electrical stimulation in healthy volunteers

The present study aimed to evaluate the elbow flexor force induced by perineural intramuscular stimulation compared with surface electrical stimulation (ES) and maximal voluntary contraction. Thirty nondominant arms of healthy volunteers were evaluated. Isometric elbow flexion force was evaluated using a surface electrode stimulation at the biceps brachii muscle, a perineural intramuscular stimulation around the musculocutaneous nerve, and maximum voluntary contraction. The elbow flexion force was measured at the wrist volar area in a 90° elbow flexion posture, fixed with a rigid elbow orthosis. Pain and discomfort associated with ES were evaluated using a numeric rating scale. The mean maximum elbow flexion force was 16.6 ± 4.1 kgf via voluntary contraction. The mean elbow flexion force by ES was 2.9 ± 2.0 kgf, stimulation intensity was 24.8 ± 5.5 mA, and the numeric rating scale was 5.0 ± 2.5 via surface electrode stimulation and 3.1 ± 2.0 kgf, 5.0 mA, and 3.8 ± 1.9 via perineural stimulation, respectively. ES provides 16% to 18% of the maximal voluntary contraction force in elbow flexion, which corresponds to a fair grade of muscle force. Perineural intramuscular stimulation can generate an equivocal contraction force with less discomfort in elbow flexion than surface electrode stimulation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2024-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000040043
Primary Topic
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimation of the muscle force by perineural intramuscular electrical stimulation in healthy volunteers

Jae Min Kim, Sun Jae Won, Yeun Jie Yoo, Mi–Jeong Yoon et al.
Medicine
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
article

Estimation of the muscle force by perineural intramuscular electrical stimulation in healthy volunteers

Jae Min Kim, Sun Jae Won, Yeun Jie Yoo, Mi–Jeong Yoon, Tae‐Woo Kim, So-youn Chang, Hye Jung Park, Se Won Lee
article en

Abstract

The present study aimed to evaluate the elbow flexor force induced by perineural intramuscular stimulation compared with surface electrical stimulation (ES) and maximal voluntary contraction. Thirty nondominant arms of healthy volunteers were evaluated. Isometric elbow flexion force was evaluated using a surface electrode stimulation at the biceps brachii muscle, a perineural intramuscular stimulation around the musculocutaneous nerve, and maximum voluntary contraction. The elbow flexion force was measured at the wrist volar area in a 90° elbow flexion posture, fixed with a rigid elbow orthosis. Pain and discomfort associated with ES were evaluated using a numeric rating scale. The mean maximum elbow flexion force was 16.6 ± 4.1 kgf via voluntary contraction. The mean elbow flexion force by ES was 2.9 ± 2.0 kgf, stimulation intensity was 24.8 ± 5.5 mA, and the numeric rating scale was 5.0 ± 2.5 via surface electrode stimulation and 3.1 ± 2.0 kgf, 5.0 mA, and 3.8 ± 1.9 via perineural stimulation, respectively. ES provides 16% to 18% of the maximal voluntary contraction force in elbow flexion, which corresponds to a fair grade of muscle force. Perineural intramuscular stimulation can generate an equivocal contraction force with less discomfort in elbow flexion than surface electrode stimulation.

MedicineVol. 103(41)
Seoul National University (KR), Health Volunteers Overseas (US), The Catholic University of Korea St. Vincent's Hospital (KR), The Catholic University of Korea Incheon St. Mary's Hospital (KR), The Catholic University of Korea Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital (KR), National Rehabilitation Center (KR), The Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's Hospital (KR), S.P.E.C.I.E.S. (US), Catholic University of Korea (KR)
National Research Foundation, National Research Foundation of Korea
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.