Chemomechanical Pairing of Alloy Anodes and Solid-State Electrolytes

Alloy anodes present promising alternatives to alkali metals in solid-state batteries but still face morphological instability upon cycling. Unlike conventional batteries using liquid electrolytes, interfacial evolution between solid-state electrolytes and alloy anodes is determined by interfacial electrochemistry and mechanics. Here, we adapt a classical chemomechanical model for Li metal to apply to alloy anodes. This allows generalizing a principle, namely, the hard and soft electrolytes and alloy anodes pairing principle, to guide improving morphological stability. Specifically, “hard” (high-shear-modulus) ceramic electrolytes should be paired with “harder” alloys, while “soft” (low-shear-modulus) polymer electrolytes favor “softer” alloys. We examine the chemomechanical properties of several Li–M alloys (M = Al, Mg, In, Sn, and Sb). Consistent with the principle, the “harder” Li–Sn anode exhibits a flattened morphology with the “hard” Li6PS5Cl electrolyte after cycling. Conversely, the “softer” Li–In anode evolves extremely rough, indicating Li–In dendrite formation. Our work underscores the significance of tuning alloy anode mechanical properties, incorporating well-established rules in traditional metallurgy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Energy Letters
Published
2024-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.4c01983
Citations
14
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.92

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Chemomechanical Pairing of Alloy Anodes and Solid-State Electrolytes

Yunlong Guo, Zhen Ping Zhou, Bin Tang, Shou‐Hang Bo et al.
14 citations
ACS Energy Letters
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
2.92
article

Chemomechanical Pairing of Alloy Anodes and Solid-State Electrolytes

Yunlong Guo, Zhen Ping Zhou, Bin Tang, Shou‐Hang Bo, Shiwei Chen, Qingbo Cao, Xinyu Yu
article en
14 citations

Abstract

Alloy anodes present promising alternatives to alkali metals in solid-state batteries but still face morphological instability upon cycling. Unlike conventional batteries using liquid electrolytes, interfacial evolution between solid-state electrolytes and alloy anodes is determined by interfacial electrochemistry and mechanics. Here, we adapt a classical chemomechanical model for Li metal to apply to alloy anodes. This allows generalizing a principle, namely, the hard and soft electrolytes and alloy anodes pairing principle, to guide improving morphological stability. Specifically, “hard” (high-shear-modulus) ceramic electrolytes should be paired with “harder” alloys, while “soft” (low-shear-modulus) polymer electrolytes favor “softer” alloys. We examine the chemomechanical properties of several Li–M alloys (M = Al, Mg, In, Sn, and Sb). Consistent with the principle, the “harder” Li–Sn anode exhibits a flattened morphology with the “hard” Li6PS5Cl electrolyte after cycling. Conversely, the “softer” Li–In anode evolves extremely rough, indicating Li–In dendrite formation. Our work underscores the significance of tuning alloy anode mechanical properties, incorporating well-established rules in traditional metallurgy.

ACS Energy LettersVol. 9(11)
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN), Joint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics (US), University of Michigan (US), Zhengzhou University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
2.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.