COMPOSITE INDICES FOR GOVERNING DIGITALIZATION: METHODS FOR CONSTRUCTION

In the circumstances of digital transformation of the state and society, the indicative approach to analyzing and governing digitalization finds active usage. However, the characteristics of relevant data cause methodological problems, including statistical duplication. The article considers various methods for constructing composite digitalization indices based on secondary aggregation of principal components in order to overcome duplication. It is hypothesized that there is no single best method for secondary aggregation, and that the preference of methods depends on the indicative evaluation tasks being addressed. The lack of scientific consensus on the best aggregation method for calculating composite indices supports this proposition. Multiple widespread aggregation methods are also described. To consider the hypothesis, two potential secondary aggregation methods, alongside the option to eschew secondary aggregation, are studied. Their advantages are analyzed using common tasks of rating and analysing the strengths and weaknesses of facilities as an example. The data for analysis include principal components extracted from 21 digitalization indicators for years 2014 and 2016. Correlation analysis of their secondary aggregation’s results and country rating comparison show that different analysed methods are suitable for different tasks. This is due to the correspondence of the methods’ properties to the requirements imposed by the tasks being solved. The practical applicability of the discussed methodologies for analysing digitalization is demonstrated by the example of the Russian Federation. The study confirmed the need to consider the index construction methods’ characteristics to select the methods most appropriate to the tasks being solved. The obtained results can serve as the basis for developing a classification of requirements posed by indicative evaluation tasks, which will also contribute to systematization of aggregation methods, which has practical usefulness within the indicative approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Administration Issues
Published
2024-09-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17323/1999-5431-2024-0-3-81-109
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Economic Development and Digital Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COMPOSITE INDICES FOR GOVERNING DIGITALIZATION: METHODS FOR CONSTRUCTION

Ivan D. Makarov
3 citations
Public Administration Issues
Economic Development and Digital Transformation
2.49
article

COMPOSITE INDICES FOR GOVERNING DIGITALIZATION: METHODS FOR CONSTRUCTION

Ivan D. Makarov
article en
3 citations

Abstract

In the circumstances of digital transformation of the state and society, the indicative approach to analyzing and governing digitalization finds active usage. However, the characteristics of relevant data cause methodological problems, including statistical duplication. The article considers various methods for constructing composite digitalization indices based on secondary aggregation of principal components in order to overcome duplication. It is hypothesized that there is no single best method for secondary aggregation, and that the preference of methods depends on the indicative evaluation tasks being addressed. The lack of scientific consensus on the best aggregation method for calculating composite indices supports this proposition. Multiple widespread aggregation methods are also described. To consider the hypothesis, two potential secondary aggregation methods, alongside the option to eschew secondary aggregation, are studied. Their advantages are analyzed using common tasks of rating and analysing the strengths and weaknesses of facilities as an example. The data for analysis include principal components extracted from 21 digitalization indicators for years 2014 and 2016. Correlation analysis of their secondary aggregation’s results and country rating comparison show that different analysed methods are suitable for different tasks. This is due to the correspondence of the methods’ properties to the requirements imposed by the tasks being solved. The practical applicability of the discussed methodologies for analysing digitalization is demonstrated by the example of the Russian Federation. The study confirmed the need to consider the index construction methods’ characteristics to select the methods most appropriate to the tasks being solved. The obtained results can serve as the basis for developing a classification of requirements posed by indicative evaluation tasks, which will also contribute to systematization of aggregation methods, which has practical usefulness within the indicative approach.

Public Administration Issues(3)
National Research University Higher School of Economics (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Economic Development and Digital Transformation
2.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.