Quantitative Evaluation of Microcirculatory Alterations in Patients with COVID-19 and Bacterial Septic Shock through Remote Photoplethysmography and Automated Capillary Refill Time Analysis

<i>Background and Objectives:</i> Sepsis, a leading global health challenge, accounts for around 20% of deaths worldwide. The complexity of sepsis, especially the difference between bacterial and viral etiologies, requires an effective assessment of microcirculation during resuscitation. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of infusion therapy on microcirculation in patients with sepsis, focusing on bacterial- and COVID-19-associated sepsis using remote photoplethysmography (rPPG) and the automated capillary refill time (aCRT). <i>Materials and Methods:</i> This single-center prospective study was conducted in the ICU of Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital, including 20 patients with sepsis/septic shock. The patients were selected based on hemodynamic instability and divided into COVID-19 and Bacterial Septic Shock groups. Fluid responsiveness was assessed using the Passive Leg Raising Test (PLRT). Systemic hemodynamics and microcirculation were monitored through MAP CRT, rPPG, and serum lactate levels. Statistical analyses compared responses within and between the groups across different stages of the protocol. <i>Results:</i> The Bacterial group exhibited higher initial serum lactate levels and more pronounced microcirculatory dysfunction than the COVID-19 group. rPPG was more sensitive in detecting perfusion changes, showing significant differences between the groups. The automated CRT demonstrated greater sensitivity compared to the manual CRT, revealing significant differences during PLRT stages between bacterial- and COVID-19-associated sepsis. Both groups had a transient hemodynamic response to PLRT, with subsequent stabilization upon fluid infusion. <i>Conclusions:</i> When managing patients with sepsis in intensive care, monitoring microcirculation is of paramount importance in infusion therapy. Our study highlights the potential of rPPG and aCRT as tools for this purpose. These techniques can be used in conjunction with routine parameters, such as lactate levels and systemic hemodynamic parameters, to provide a comprehensive assessment of a patient's condition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicina
Published
2024-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60101680
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantitative Evaluation of Microcirculatory Alterations in Patients with COVID-19 and Bacterial Septic Shock through Remote Photoplethysmography and Automated Capillary Refill Time Analysis

Zbigņevs Marcinkevičs, Darja Smirnova, Uldis Rubīns, Mara Klibus et al.
2 citations
Medicina
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
1.15
article

Quantitative Evaluation of Microcirculatory Alterations in Patients with COVID-19 and Bacterial Septic Shock through Remote Photoplethysmography and Automated Capillary Refill Time Analysis

Zbigņevs Marcinkevičs, Darja Smirnova, Uldis Rubīns, Mara Klibus, Oļegs Sabeļņikovs, Indulis Vanags, Andris Grabovskis
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<i>Background and Objectives:</i> Sepsis, a leading global health challenge, accounts for around 20% of deaths worldwide. The complexity of sepsis, especially the difference between bacterial and viral etiologies, requires an effective assessment of microcirculation during resuscitation. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of infusion therapy on microcirculation in patients with sepsis, focusing on bacterial- and COVID-19-associated sepsis using remote photoplethysmography (rPPG) and the automated capillary refill time (aCRT). <i>Materials and Methods:</i> This single-center prospective study was conducted in the ICU of Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital, including 20 patients with sepsis/septic shock. The patients were selected based on hemodynamic instability and divided into COVID-19 and Bacterial Septic Shock groups. Fluid responsiveness was assessed using the Passive Leg Raising Test (PLRT). Systemic hemodynamics and microcirculation were monitored through MAP CRT, rPPG, and serum lactate levels. Statistical analyses compared responses within and between the groups across different stages of the protocol. <i>Results:</i> The Bacterial group exhibited higher initial serum lactate levels and more pronounced microcirculatory dysfunction than the COVID-19 group. rPPG was more sensitive in detecting perfusion changes, showing significant differences between the groups. The automated CRT demonstrated greater sensitivity compared to the manual CRT, revealing significant differences during PLRT stages between bacterial- and COVID-19-associated sepsis. Both groups had a transient hemodynamic response to PLRT, with subsequent stabilization upon fluid infusion. <i>Conclusions:</i> When managing patients with sepsis in intensive care, monitoring microcirculation is of paramount importance in infusion therapy. Our study highlights the potential of rPPG and aCRT as tools for this purpose. These techniques can be used in conjunction with routine parameters, such as lactate levels and systemic hemodynamic parameters, to provide a comprehensive assessment of a patient's condition.

MedicinaVol. 60(10)
Pauls Stradiņš Clinical University Hospital (LV), Riga Stradiņš University (LV), University of Latvia (LV)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.