The right to the city for urban refugees? Living in the shadow of the camp in Nairobi, Amman and Addis Ababa

This paper investigates the multiple ways in which the lives of urban refugees are impacted by the presence of refugee camps. It builds on a growing body of literature on the urban refugee experience that recognizes the agency exercised in the rejection of the camp. But it also demonstrates how, in countries with an encampment policy, the presence of camps can limit urban refugees’ mobility and their ability to take advantage of all that urban life has to offer. It also highlights the consequences of the choice refugees must make between receiving humanitarian aid in a camp and living unassisted in an urban area. The paper draws on qualitative interviews with refugees in Ethiopia, Kenya and Jordan. It presents conclusions on the inadequacy of the international response, which fails to capitalize on the presence of displaced people in cities, to achieve the supposed policy goal of “self-reliance”.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environment and Urbanization
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09562478241277077
Primary Topic
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The right to the city for urban refugees? Living in the shadow of the camp in Nairobi, Amman and Addis Ababa

Lucy Earle
Environment and Urbanization
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
article

The right to the city for urban refugees? Living in the shadow of the camp in Nairobi, Amman and Addis Ababa

Lucy Earle
article en

Abstract

This paper investigates the multiple ways in which the lives of urban refugees are impacted by the presence of refugee camps. It builds on a growing body of literature on the urban refugee experience that recognizes the agency exercised in the rejection of the camp. But it also demonstrates how, in countries with an encampment policy, the presence of camps can limit urban refugees’ mobility and their ability to take advantage of all that urban life has to offer. It also highlights the consequences of the choice refugees must make between receiving humanitarian aid in a camp and living unassisted in an urban area. The paper draws on qualitative interviews with refugees in Ethiopia, Kenya and Jordan. It presents conclusions on the inadequacy of the international response, which fails to capitalize on the presence of displaced people in cities, to achieve the supposed policy goal of “self-reliance”.

Environment and UrbanizationVol. 36(2)
International Institute for Environment and Development (GB)
Bernard van Leer Foundation, IKEA Foundation, Direktion für Entwicklung und Zusammenarbeit, Economic and Social Research Council
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The right to the city for urban refugees? Living in the shadow of the camp in Nairobi, Amman and Addis Ababa — Lucy Earle · Environment and Urbanization (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS