ePortfolio traditions that are ready to be broken and new ones ready to be established

Although ePortfolio practices have been with us for a good 20+ years, in some form or another, the options that students and staff now have to represent their professional experiences have expanded over recent years. This is largely due to the plethora of online platforms that allow a user-friendly and templated experience, giving students freedoms they have not previously had, unless they had website development skills. This paper will report on a study of current ePortfolio platform options provided by institutions in Australasia, highlighting a divergence in, and opinions around, what constitutes contemporary good practice. It is fair to say that what was once seen as the responsibility of an institution to provide a dedicated ePortfolio platform for their students has started to fracture and that many institutions are now opting to mediate third-party and/or discipline-relevant options for their students. This paper will look at the pros and cons of these options, but also some emerging trends brought on by the advent of Generative AI, that institutions can now take advantage of.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice
Published
2024-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53761/c2tcmt21
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Reflective Practices in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.10
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ePortfolio traditions that are ready to be broken and new ones ready to be established

Michael Sankey
1 citations
Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice
Reflective Practices in Education
2.10
article

ePortfolio traditions that are ready to be broken and new ones ready to be established

Michael Sankey
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Although ePortfolio practices have been with us for a good 20+ years, in some form or another, the options that students and staff now have to represent their professional experiences have expanded over recent years. This is largely due to the plethora of online platforms that allow a user-friendly and templated experience, giving students freedoms they have not previously had, unless they had website development skills. This paper will report on a study of current ePortfolio platform options provided by institutions in Australasia, highlighting a divergence in, and opinions around, what constitutes contemporary good practice. It is fair to say that what was once seen as the responsibility of an institution to provide a dedicated ePortfolio platform for their students has started to fracture and that many institutions are now opting to mediate third-party and/or discipline-relevant options for their students. This paper will look at the pros and cons of these options, but also some emerging trends brought on by the advent of Generative AI, that institutions can now take advantage of.

Journal of University Teaching and Learning PracticeVol. 22(3)
Charles Darwin University (AU)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Reflective Practices in Education
2.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.