Building locally anchored implementation science capacity: the case of the adolescent HIV implementation science alliance-supported local iS alliances

Background The Fogarty International Center-led Adolescent HIV Implementation Science Alliance (AHISA) supports region-/country-specific implementation science (IS) alliances that build collaborations between research, policy, and program partners that respond to local implementation challenges. AHISA supported the development of seven locally-led IS alliances: five country-specific (i.e., Kenya, South Africa, Tanzania, Uganda, and Zambia), one in Central and West Africa, and one with youth researchers. This article outlines the aims, activities, and outcomes of local alliances, demonstrating how they enhance sustainable IS activities to address local challenges. Methods We conducted a desk review of each alliance's funding applications, reports, and data from the initial findings of a larger AHISA evaluation. The review analyzes common approaches, highlights their local relevance, and summarizes initial outcomes. Results The local alliances have a common goal: to expand implementation of successful interventions to improve adolescent HIV. We identified four overarching themes across the local alliances’ activities: capacity building, priority setting, stakeholder engagement, and knowledge dissemination. Research capacity building activities include long-term mentorship between junior and senior researchers and short-term training for non-research partners. Setting priorities with members identifies local research needs and streamlines activities. Alliances incorporate substantial engagement between partners, particularly youth, who may serve as leaders and co-create activities. Dissemination shares activities and results broadly. Conclusion Local IS alliances play a key role in building sustainable IS learning and collaboration platforms, enabling improved uptake of evidence into policy and programs, increased IS research capacity, and shared approaches to addressing implementation challenges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Health Services
Published
2024-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2024.1439957
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Building locally anchored implementation science capacity: the case of the adolescent HIV implementation science alliance-supported local iS alliances

Cyrus Mugo, Rachel Sturke, Michael T. Mbizvo, Susan Vorkoper et al.
2 citations
Frontiers in Health Services
Health Policy Implementation Science
1.70
article

Building locally anchored implementation science capacity: the case of the adolescent HIV implementation science alliance-supported local iS alliances

Cyrus Mugo, Rachel Sturke, Michael T. Mbizvo, Susan Vorkoper, Nadia A. Sam‐Agudu, Dorothy E. Dow, Kawango Agot, Brian C. Zanoni, Fred Collins Semitala
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Background The Fogarty International Center-led Adolescent HIV Implementation Science Alliance (AHISA) supports region-/country-specific implementation science (IS) alliances that build collaborations between research, policy, and program partners that respond to local implementation challenges. AHISA supported the development of seven locally-led IS alliances: five country-specific (i.e., Kenya, South Africa, Tanzania, Uganda, and Zambia), one in Central and West Africa, and one with youth researchers. This article outlines the aims, activities, and outcomes of local alliances, demonstrating how they enhance sustainable IS activities to address local challenges. Methods We conducted a desk review of each alliance's funding applications, reports, and data from the initial findings of a larger AHISA evaluation. The review analyzes common approaches, highlights their local relevance, and summarizes initial outcomes. Results The local alliances have a common goal: to expand implementation of successful interventions to improve adolescent HIV. We identified four overarching themes across the local alliances’ activities: capacity building, priority setting, stakeholder engagement, and knowledge dissemination. Research capacity building activities include long-term mentorship between junior and senior researchers and short-term training for non-research partners. Setting priorities with members identifies local research needs and streamlines activities. Alliances incorporate substantial engagement between partners, particularly youth, who may serve as leaders and co-create activities. Dissemination shares activities and results broadly. Conclusion Local IS alliances play a key role in building sustainable IS learning and collaboration platforms, enabling improved uptake of evidence into policy and programs, increased IS research capacity, and shared approaches to addressing implementation challenges.

Frontiers in Health ServicesVol. 4
National Institutes of Health (US), University of Cape Coast (GH), Emory University (US), Kenyatta National Hospital (KE), Impact Research and Development Organization (KE), Institute of Human Virology (NG), Duke Institute for Health Innovation (US), Duke Medical Center (US), University of Minnesota Medical Center (US), National HIV/AIDS/STI/TB Council (ZM), Children's Healthcare of Atlanta (US), Makerere University (UG), Fogarty International Center (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Health Policy Implementation Science
1.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.