Comparative Evaluation of GeneXpert With Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) Stain in Samples of Suspected Tuberculosis Cases at a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital in Central India

Background Tuberculosis (TB) remains a significant public health challenge, particularly in developing countries, where delayed diagnosis contributes to ongoing transmission. Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) smear microscopy, commonly used for TB diagnosis, has limitations in sensitivity, especially in cases of extrapulmonary tuberculosis (ETB). The GeneXpert <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> (MTB)/rifampicin (RIF) assay, a molecular diagnostic tool, offers rapid and accurate detection of MTB and RIF resistance. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic efficacy of GeneXpert MTB/RIF with ZN staining in detecting pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) and ETB. Methods A prospective study was conducted over two years (April 2022 to April 2024) at a tertiary care teaching hospital in India. A total of 319 clinical samples from patients with suspected PTB and ETB were analyzed. Samples underwent ZN staining and GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated using mycobacterial culture as the gold standard. The chi-square test was employed to compare diagnostic accuracy, with a p-value of <0.05 considered statistically significant. Results Of the 319 samples, ZN staining was positive in 18.2% of cases, while GeneXpert was positive in 21.6%. GeneXpert demonstrated a perfect sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 98.81%, compared to ZN staining's sensitivity of 84.85% and specificity of 99.21%. GeneXpert showed superior performance in detecting TB in both pulmonary and extrapulmonary samples, with a statistically significant difference (p<0.001). Additionally, GeneXpert identified six cases of RIF resistance. Conclusion The GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay outperforms ZN staining in diagnosing TB, offering higher sensitivity and comparable specificity. Its ability to detect RIF resistance adds significant clinical value. Despite its cost, the integration of GeneXpert into routine diagnostic workflows, particularly in high TB prevalence areas, is recommended to enhance early detection and treatment, thereby reducing TB transmission.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2024-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.71402
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.33
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Evaluation of GeneXpert With Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) Stain in Samples of Suspected Tuberculosis Cases at a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital in Central India

Jyoti Gupta, Rajesh Kumar Gupta, Vikas Gupta, Priyanka Joshi
6 citations
Cureus
Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
2.33
article

Comparative Evaluation of GeneXpert With Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) Stain in Samples of Suspected Tuberculosis Cases at a Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital in Central India

Jyoti Gupta, Rajesh Kumar Gupta, Vikas Gupta, Priyanka Joshi
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Background Tuberculosis (TB) remains a significant public health challenge, particularly in developing countries, where delayed diagnosis contributes to ongoing transmission. Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) smear microscopy, commonly used for TB diagnosis, has limitations in sensitivity, especially in cases of extrapulmonary tuberculosis (ETB). The GeneXpert <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> (MTB)/rifampicin (RIF) assay, a molecular diagnostic tool, offers rapid and accurate detection of MTB and RIF resistance. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic efficacy of GeneXpert MTB/RIF with ZN staining in detecting pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) and ETB. Methods A prospective study was conducted over two years (April 2022 to April 2024) at a tertiary care teaching hospital in India. A total of 319 clinical samples from patients with suspected PTB and ETB were analyzed. Samples underwent ZN staining and GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated using mycobacterial culture as the gold standard. The chi-square test was employed to compare diagnostic accuracy, with a p-value of <0.05 considered statistically significant. Results Of the 319 samples, ZN staining was positive in 18.2% of cases, while GeneXpert was positive in 21.6%. GeneXpert demonstrated a perfect sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 98.81%, compared to ZN staining's sensitivity of 84.85% and specificity of 99.21%. GeneXpert showed superior performance in detecting TB in both pulmonary and extrapulmonary samples, with a statistically significant difference (p<0.001). Additionally, GeneXpert identified six cases of RIF resistance. Conclusion The GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay outperforms ZN staining in diagnosing TB, offering higher sensitivity and comparable specificity. Its ability to detect RIF resistance adds significant clinical value. Despite its cost, the integration of GeneXpert into routine diagnostic workflows, particularly in high TB prevalence areas, is recommended to enhance early detection and treatment, thereby reducing TB transmission.

CureusVol. 16(10)
Government Medical College (IN), Discovery Air (Canada) (CA), Gandhi Medical College (IN), Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
2.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.