Hand Surgical Operating Room Size Allocation: A Comparative Space Utilisation Study

<b>Background:</b> This study evaluated operating room (OR) space required for various hand surgical procedures. We analysed the size requirements for hand surgical cases divided into four settings: (1) large OR setting requiring fluoroscopy and microsurgical equipment, (2) medium-sized OR setting for cases requiring fluoroscopy, (3) smaller OR setting and (4) minor procedural room without anaesthesia with the aim to describe room size requirements for hand surgery practices. <b>Methods:</b> A variety of hand surgical cases were selected: large cases (microvascular digit replantation), medium-sized cases (closed reduction percutaneous pinning [CRPP] of phalangeal fractures) and smaller cases (carpal tunnel release [CTR]) with and without anaesthesia. Space requirements were compared to general surgery cases (laparoscopic appendectomy) and general orthopaedic surgery cases (cephalomedullary nail [CMN]). Necessary operative equipment was measured (ft<sup>2</sup>) to calculate requirements for each procedure. <b>Results:</b> Large hand cases such as digit replantation necessitated the most OR space (125 ft<sup>2</sup>), followed by general orthopaedic cases (CMN; 118 ft<sup>2</sup>), medium-sized hand cases (CRPP phalanx; 107 ft<sup>2</sup>), general surgery laparoscopic appendectomy (68 ft<sup>2</sup>), small hand cases (CTR; 85 ft<sup>2</sup>) and minor procedures (49 ft<sup>2</sup>). <b>Conclusions:</b> Hand procedures can be divided into major procedures requiring significant OR space (125 ft<sup>2</sup>), medium procedures in standard OR suites (107 ft<sup>2</sup>), procedures in small ORs with anaesthesia (81 ft<sup>2</sup>) or office-based setting without anaesthesia (49 ft<sup>2</sup>). These findings help define space utilisation for hand procedures and may have practical implications related to efficiency, cost and patient safety in the hospital and outpatient setting. <b>Level of Evidence:</b> Level IV (Economic and Decision Analyses).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Hand Surgery (Asian-Pacific Volume)
Published
2024-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1142/s2424835525500055
Primary Topic
Surgical Simulation and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hand Surgical Operating Room Size Allocation: A Comparative Space Utilisation Study

David C. Woods, Alexander Lauder, Kyros Ipaktchi, Rajshri M. Bolson et al.
The Journal of Hand Surgery (Asian-Pacific Volume)
Surgical Simulation and Training
article

Hand Surgical Operating Room Size Allocation: A Comparative Space Utilisation Study

David C. Woods, Alexander Lauder, Kyros Ipaktchi, Rajshri M. Bolson, Jue Cao, Damian ILLING
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> This study evaluated operating room (OR) space required for various hand surgical procedures. We analysed the size requirements for hand surgical cases divided into four settings: (1) large OR setting requiring fluoroscopy and microsurgical equipment, (2) medium-sized OR setting for cases requiring fluoroscopy, (3) smaller OR setting and (4) minor procedural room without anaesthesia with the aim to describe room size requirements for hand surgery practices. <b>Methods:</b> A variety of hand surgical cases were selected: large cases (microvascular digit replantation), medium-sized cases (closed reduction percutaneous pinning [CRPP] of phalangeal fractures) and smaller cases (carpal tunnel release [CTR]) with and without anaesthesia. Space requirements were compared to general surgery cases (laparoscopic appendectomy) and general orthopaedic surgery cases (cephalomedullary nail [CMN]). Necessary operative equipment was measured (ft<sup>2</sup>) to calculate requirements for each procedure. <b>Results:</b> Large hand cases such as digit replantation necessitated the most OR space (125 ft<sup>2</sup>), followed by general orthopaedic cases (CMN; 118 ft<sup>2</sup>), medium-sized hand cases (CRPP phalanx; 107 ft<sup>2</sup>), general surgery laparoscopic appendectomy (68 ft<sup>2</sup>), small hand cases (CTR; 85 ft<sup>2</sup>) and minor procedures (49 ft<sup>2</sup>). <b>Conclusions:</b> Hand procedures can be divided into major procedures requiring significant OR space (125 ft<sup>2</sup>), medium procedures in standard OR suites (107 ft<sup>2</sup>), procedures in small ORs with anaesthesia (81 ft<sup>2</sup>) or office-based setting without anaesthesia (49 ft<sup>2</sup>). These findings help define space utilisation for hand procedures and may have practical implications related to efficiency, cost and patient safety in the hospital and outpatient setting. <b>Level of Evidence:</b> Level IV (Economic and Decision Analyses).

The Journal of Hand Surgery (Asian-Pacific Volume)Vol. 30(01)
Brown University (US), Denver Health Medical Center (US), Arnot Ogden Medical Center (US), Rocky Mountain Orthopedics (US), University of Colorado Denver (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Surgical Simulation and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.