Key Factors for Predicting Appendicitis from Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Images Obtained Through Multiplanar Reconstruction

Background: The diameter of the appendix is a key parameter in diagnosing appendicitis. The diagnostic threshold for this parameter is 6 mm, originally established through graded compression sonography of the right lower quadrant (RLQ) of the abdomen. However, without corroborative findings from computed tomography (CT), this threshold may not be a reliable indicator of appendicitis. To ensure accurate diagnosis, clinicians should perform a comprehensive, multiparameter imaging assessment of the appendix, rather than relying solely on appendix diameter. Objectives: This study aimed to identify key factors for predicting appendicitis using contrast-enhanced coronal and sagittal CT images obtained through multiplanar reconstruction. Patients and Methods: This single-center, retrospective, cross-sectional study included patients who presented to our emergency department (ED) with RLQ abdominal pain and subsequently underwent contrast-enhanced CT between July 2019 and September 2020. The primary study outcome was pathologically confirmed appendicitis. Two experienced radiologists assessed parameters such as appendix diameter, wall thickness, abnormal appendix enhancement, abnormal appendix content, appendix erection, and periappendiceal fat stranding. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify significant predictive factors for appendicitis. Results: The study included 173 patients (median age: 37 years; women: 86). They were divided into appendicitis (n = 102) and alternative diagnosis (n = 71) groups. Significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of appendix diameter, wall thickness, wall enhancement, luminal content, appendix erection, and periappendiceal fat stranding (P < 0.001). The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity values for an appendix diameter threshold of 7.7 mm were 91% and 82%, respectively. An appendix diameter of > 7.7 mm (OR: 15.3; P < 0.001), abnormal appendix enhancement (OR: 12.5; P < 0.001), and appendix erection (OR: 6.1; P = 0.004) emerged as significant independent predictors of appendicitis. Conclusion: An appendix diameter of 7.7 mm appears to be the optimal threshold for diagnosing appendicitis. Additionally, the detection of abnormal appendix enhancement and appendix erection on contrast-enhanced CT images holds considerable diagnostic value.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Iranian Journal of Radiology
Published
2024-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol-146134
Primary Topic
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Key Factors for Predicting Appendicitis from Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Images Obtained Through Multiplanar Reconstruction

Yon‐Cheong Wong, Jen-Suh Chern, H.-W. Chen, Being Chuan Lin et al.
Iranian Journal of Radiology
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
article

Key Factors for Predicting Appendicitis from Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Images Obtained Through Multiplanar Reconstruction

Yon‐Cheong Wong, Jen-Suh Chern, H.-W. Chen, Being Chuan Lin, Li Jen Wang, Cheng Wu
article en

Abstract

Background: The diameter of the appendix is a key parameter in diagnosing appendicitis. The diagnostic threshold for this parameter is 6 mm, originally established through graded compression sonography of the right lower quadrant (RLQ) of the abdomen. However, without corroborative findings from computed tomography (CT), this threshold may not be a reliable indicator of appendicitis. To ensure accurate diagnosis, clinicians should perform a comprehensive, multiparameter imaging assessment of the appendix, rather than relying solely on appendix diameter. Objectives: This study aimed to identify key factors for predicting appendicitis using contrast-enhanced coronal and sagittal CT images obtained through multiplanar reconstruction. Patients and Methods: This single-center, retrospective, cross-sectional study included patients who presented to our emergency department (ED) with RLQ abdominal pain and subsequently underwent contrast-enhanced CT between July 2019 and September 2020. The primary study outcome was pathologically confirmed appendicitis. Two experienced radiologists assessed parameters such as appendix diameter, wall thickness, abnormal appendix enhancement, abnormal appendix content, appendix erection, and periappendiceal fat stranding. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify significant predictive factors for appendicitis. Results: The study included 173 patients (median age: 37 years; women: 86). They were divided into appendicitis (n = 102) and alternative diagnosis (n = 71) groups. Significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of appendix diameter, wall thickness, wall enhancement, luminal content, appendix erection, and periappendiceal fat stranding (P < 0.001). The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity values for an appendix diameter threshold of 7.7 mm were 91% and 82%, respectively. An appendix diameter of > 7.7 mm (OR: 15.3; P < 0.001), abnormal appendix enhancement (OR: 12.5; P < 0.001), and appendix erection (OR: 6.1; P = 0.004) emerged as significant independent predictors of appendicitis. Conclusion: An appendix diameter of 7.7 mm appears to be the optimal threshold for diagnosing appendicitis. Additionally, the detection of abnormal appendix enhancement and appendix erection on contrast-enhanced CT images holds considerable diagnostic value.

Iranian Journal of RadiologyVol. 21(2)
Chang Gung University (TW), Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (TW)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.