Air to liquid heat transfer coefficient experimental comparison between silicon carbide and glass shell and tube heat exchangers in a pilot plant scale

Instead of the expected 3.8–5.4% increase in the heat transfer coefficient due to the better thermal conductivity of silicon carbide tubes compared to glass tubes, the observed increase was 18–22% for 150–275kg·h1 airflow and 6kg·s1 propane-1,2-diol coolant in tubes. This additional 15–17% increase is probably due to local flow turbulisation due to the roughness of the sintered carbide of 4–10µm, which unfortunately also causes a 17–24% higher air pressure drop. The hand calculation model used underestimates the heat transfer coefficient by 2% to 10%, which is better than CHEMCAD 8 modeling results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Experimental Heat Transfer
Published
2024-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/08916152.2024.2413978
Primary Topic
Heat Transfer and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Air to liquid heat transfer coefficient experimental comparison between silicon carbide and glass shell and tube heat exchangers in a pilot plant scale

Tomáš Svěrák, Petr Horvát
Experimental Heat Transfer
Heat Transfer and Optimization
article

Air to liquid heat transfer coefficient experimental comparison between silicon carbide and glass shell and tube heat exchangers in a pilot plant scale

Tomáš Svěrák, Petr Horvát
article en

Abstract

Instead of the expected 3.8–5.4% increase in the heat transfer coefficient due to the better thermal conductivity of silicon carbide tubes compared to glass tubes, the observed increase was 18–22% for 150–275kg·h1 airflow and 6kg·s1 propane-1,2-diol coolant in tubes. This additional 15–17% increase is probably due to local flow turbulisation due to the roughness of the sintered carbide of 4–10µm, which unfortunately also causes a 17–24% higher air pressure drop. The hand calculation model used underestimates the heat transfer coefficient by 2% to 10%, which is better than CHEMCAD 8 modeling results.

Experimental Heat TransferVol. 38(6)
Brno University of Technology (CZ)
Vysoké Učení Technické v Brně
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Heat Transfer and Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.