Reconciling Top‐Down and Bottom‐Up Estimates of Ecosystem Respiration in a Mature Eucalypt Forest
Abstract Ecosystem respiration (R eco ) arises from interacting autotrophic and heterotrophic processes constrained by distinct drivers. Here, we evaluated up‐scaling of observed components of R eco in a mature eucalypt forest in southeast Australia and assessed whether a land surface model adequately represented all the fluxes and their seasonal temperature responses. We measured respiration from soil (R soil ), heterotrophic soil microbes (R h ), roots (R root ), and stems (R stem ) in 2018–2019. R eco and its components were simulated using the CABLE–POP (Community Atmosphere‐Biosphere Land Exchange–Population Orders Physiology) land surface model, constrained by eddy covariance and chamber measurements and enabled with a newly implemented Dual Arrhenius and Michaelis‐Menten (DAMM) module for soil organic matter decomposition. Eddy‐covariance based R eco (R eco.eddy , 1,439 g C m −2 y −1 ) was slightly higher than the sum of the respiration components (R eco.sum, 1,295 g C m −2 y −1 ) and simulated R eco (1,297 g C m −2 y −1 ). The largest mean contribution to R eco was from R soil (64%) across seasons. The measured contributions of R h (49%), R root (15%), and R stem (22%) to R eco.sum were very close to model outputs of 46%, 11%, and 22%, respectively. The modeled R h was highly correlated with measured R h (R 2 = 0.66, RMSE = 0.61), empirically validating the DAMM module. The apparent temperature sensitivities (Q 10 ) of R eco were 2.22 for R eco.sum , 2.15 for R eco.eddy , and 1.57 for CABLE‐POP. This research demonstrated that bottom‐up respiration component measurements can be successfully scaled to eddy covariance‐based R eco and help to better constrain the magnitude of individual respiration components as well as their temperature sensitivities in land surface models.
Authors
- Eric A. Davidson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8525-8697)
- Elise Pendall (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1651-8969)
- Vanessa Haverd (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4359-5895)
- Jürgen Knauer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4947-7067)
- Craig V. M. Barton (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0085-0534)
- Mark G. Tjoelker (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4607-5238)
- Jinyan Yang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4936-0627)
- Alexandre A. Renchon (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9521-5092)
- Stefan K. Arndt (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7086-9375)
- Debjani Sihi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5513-8862)
- Anne Griebel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4476-8279)
- Nam Jin Noh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5227-7437)
- Jinquan Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2219-2571)
Institutions
- University of Technology Sydney (AU)
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- Argonne National Laboratory (US)
- Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
- North Carolina State University (US)
- University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science (US)
- Kangwon National University (KR)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Fudan University (CN)
- Western Sydney University (AU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences
- Published
- 2024-10-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1029/2024jg008064
- Citations
- 7
- Primary Topic
- Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.98
Funders
- Western Sydney University
- Australian Research Council