On value efficiency analysis and cone-ratio data envelopment analysis models

Abstract In this paper we relate the Value Efficiency Analysis (VEA) efficiency scores with those of three different Cone-Ratio Data Envelopment Analysis (CR-DEA) models, when the chosen model Decision Making Units (DMUs) in CR-DEA jointly comprise the Most Preferred Solution (MPS) in VEA. In particular, we consider the cases where the set of feasible weight vectors is given respectively by (i) the weight vectors that are jointly optimal in DEA for all the model DMUs, (ii) every weight vector that is optimal in DEA for at least one of the model DMUs, and (iii) only those weight vectors with strictly positive input and output weights, each of which is jointly optimal in DEA for all the model DMUs. In each of these cases we show that the CR-DEA efficiency scores can be obtained or approximated by estimating either a VEA model or a series of VEA models, without the need of identifying a priori the set of feasible weight vectors. We illustrate the usefulness of our results by means of an empirical application using data on Japanese regional banks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Productivity Analysis
Published
2024-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-024-00735-1
Primary Topic
Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On value efficiency analysis and cone-ratio data envelopment analysis models

Giannis Karagiannis, Panagiotis Ravanos
Journal of Productivity Analysis
Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
article

On value efficiency analysis and cone-ratio data envelopment analysis models

Giannis Karagiannis, Panagiotis Ravanos
article en

Abstract

Abstract In this paper we relate the Value Efficiency Analysis (VEA) efficiency scores with those of three different Cone-Ratio Data Envelopment Analysis (CR-DEA) models, when the chosen model Decision Making Units (DMUs) in CR-DEA jointly comprise the Most Preferred Solution (MPS) in VEA. In particular, we consider the cases where the set of feasible weight vectors is given respectively by (i) the weight vectors that are jointly optimal in DEA for all the model DMUs, (ii) every weight vector that is optimal in DEA for at least one of the model DMUs, and (iii) only those weight vectors with strictly positive input and output weights, each of which is jointly optimal in DEA for all the model DMUs. In each of these cases we show that the CR-DEA efficiency scores can be obtained or approximated by estimating either a VEA model or a series of VEA models, without the need of identifying a priori the set of feasible weight vectors. We illustrate the usefulness of our results by means of an empirical application using data on Japanese regional banks.

Journal of Productivity AnalysisVol. 63(1)
University of Macedonia (GR), Joint Research Centre (IT)
University of Macedonia, General Secretariat for Research and Technology
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

On value efficiency analysis and cone-ratio data envelopment analysis models — Giannis Karagiannis, Panagiotis Ravanos · Journal of Productivity Analysis (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS