There and Back Again: How UK–EU De‐Institutionalisation After Brexit Shaped Re‐Engagement After Ukraine

Abstract Russia's invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 disrupted the status quo of the European security order and brought about a re‐engagement in the UK–EU security relationship. However, co‐operation remains informal and ad hoc in ways that diverge from theoretical expectations of security co‐operation in the face of external threats. Applying insights from Historical Institutionalism and drawing on semi‐structured elite interviews with UK and EU officials from 2017 to 2023, our article explains why a shock as severe as the Russian invasion was not sufficient to bring about the wholesale renewal of UK–EU co‐operation. Our analysis demonstrates that the exogenous shock of conflict interacted with path‐dependent dynamics stemming from the Brexit process, shaping the institutional outcomes and limiting co‐operation in important ways. We show that co‐operation has intensified only when problematic Brexit legacies have been removed, arguing that UK–EU security re‐engagement represents a phased process rather than a linear one.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies
Published
2024-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13694
Citations
4
Primary Topic
European Union Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.92

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

There and Back Again: How UK–EU De‐Institutionalisation After Brexit Shaped Re‐Engagement After Ukraine

Benjamin Martill, Monika Sus
4 citations
JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies
European Union Policy and Governance
8.92
article

There and Back Again: How UK–EU De‐Institutionalisation After Brexit Shaped Re‐Engagement After Ukraine

Benjamin Martill, Monika Sus
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Russia's invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 disrupted the status quo of the European security order and brought about a re‐engagement in the UK–EU security relationship. However, co‐operation remains informal and ad hoc in ways that diverge from theoretical expectations of security co‐operation in the face of external threats. Applying insights from Historical Institutionalism and drawing on semi‐structured elite interviews with UK and EU officials from 2017 to 2023, our article explains why a shock as severe as the Russian invasion was not sufficient to bring about the wholesale renewal of UK–EU co‐operation. Our analysis demonstrates that the exogenous shock of conflict interacted with path‐dependent dynamics stemming from the Brexit process, shaping the institutional outcomes and limiting co‐operation in important ways. We show that co‐operation has intensified only when problematic Brexit legacies have been removed, arguing that UK–EU security re‐engagement represents a phased process rather than a linear one.

JCMS Journal of Common Market StudiesVol. 64(1)
Hertie School (DE), Institute of Psychology (PL), Institute of Political Studies (PL), European University Institute (IT), University of Edinburgh (GB), Polish Academy of Sciences (PL)
Government of the United Kingdom, Narodowe Centrum Nauki, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
European Union Policy and Governance
8.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.