Adult decision-making capacity and health research in Aotearoa New Zealand

The Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers' Rights (the Code)1 and the Health and Disability Commissioner Act (the Act)2 are up for review. The Code currently applies to clinical care, teaching and research. When it was introduced, there were no national mechanisms to govern research, but since then the National Ethics Advisory Committee (NEAC) has developed detailed guidelines and established a network of ethics committees at various institutional levels. As currently written, the Code prohibits research on a patient who lacks capacity unless it is in their "best interests." This precludes some important research. The NEAC guidelines are more nuanced and measured, designed to balance the risks to the patient with the benefits to the community. We argue that the Code and the Act should be amended to allow decisions about research proposals on people who lack capacity to be made by an ethics committee set up by NEAC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Zealand Medical Journal
Published
2024-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26635/6965.6684
Primary Topic
Healthcare innovation and challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adult decision-making capacity and health research in Aotearoa New Zealand

Ben Gray, Angela Ballantyne
New Zealand Medical Journal
Healthcare innovation and challenges
article

Adult decision-making capacity and health research in Aotearoa New Zealand

Ben Gray, Angela Ballantyne
article en

Abstract

The Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers' Rights (the Code)1 and the Health and Disability Commissioner Act (the Act)2 are up for review. The Code currently applies to clinical care, teaching and research. When it was introduced, there were no national mechanisms to govern research, but since then the National Ethics Advisory Committee (NEAC) has developed detailed guidelines and established a network of ethics committees at various institutional levels. As currently written, the Code prohibits research on a patient who lacks capacity unless it is in their "best interests." This precludes some important research. The NEAC guidelines are more nuanced and measured, designed to balance the risks to the patient with the benefits to the community. We argue that the Code and the Act should be amended to allow decisions about research proposals on people who lack capacity to be made by an ethics committee set up by NEAC.

New Zealand Medical JournalVol. 137(1604)
University of Otago (NZ)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Healthcare innovation and challenges
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Adult decision-making capacity and health research in Aotearoa New Zealand — Ben Gray, Angela Ballantyne · New Zealand Medical Journal (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS