Emissions effect of financial development in the GCC: is the effect asymmetric?

Abstract Obviously, financial development is one of the factors to consider in designing climate policies. We investigated the effects of financial development on co 2 emissions alongside income, total factor productivity, and international trade in Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries. Ignoring common factors can lead to erroneous findings and misleading policy recommendations. The same consequences occur if the nature of a factor’s effects is incorrectly considered. Hence, the Asymmetric Pooled Mean Group augmented with common unobserved factors—a cutting-edge method allowing for the discovery of not only the features of the pooled panel but also the characteristics of each country—was applied to data from 1992 to 2021. Additionally, we accounted for key properties of the panel time series data—cross-sectional dependence, non-stationarity and heterogeneity. To our knowledge, there is no such application for GCC countries, and only one internationally. In designing climate policy measures, a few key findings of our research are worth considering. (i) policies should account for factors common to GCC countries, as ignoring them makes co 2 effects of financial development misleading. (ii) an upturn in financial development leads to less emissions than a downturn in it. This asymmetric effect implies that policies should boost financial development. (iii) co 2 in GCC countries may converge to an identical relationship in the long run implying that there are common climate initiatives and projects that GCC authorities should work on jointly.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Economics and Policy Studies
Published
2024-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-024-00417-0
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.78
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Emissions effect of financial development in the GCC: is the effect asymmetric?

Elchin Suleymanov, Shahriyar Mukhtarov, Sa’d Shannak, Fakhri Hasanov
6 citations
Environmental Economics and Policy Studies
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
6.78
article

Emissions effect of financial development in the GCC: is the effect asymmetric?

Elchin Suleymanov, Shahriyar Mukhtarov, Sa’d Shannak, Fakhri Hasanov
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Abstract Obviously, financial development is one of the factors to consider in designing climate policies. We investigated the effects of financial development on co 2 emissions alongside income, total factor productivity, and international trade in Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries. Ignoring common factors can lead to erroneous findings and misleading policy recommendations. The same consequences occur if the nature of a factor’s effects is incorrectly considered. Hence, the Asymmetric Pooled Mean Group augmented with common unobserved factors—a cutting-edge method allowing for the discovery of not only the features of the pooled panel but also the characteristics of each country—was applied to data from 1992 to 2021. Additionally, we accounted for key properties of the panel time series data—cross-sectional dependence, non-stationarity and heterogeneity. To our knowledge, there is no such application for GCC countries, and only one internationally. In designing climate policy measures, a few key findings of our research are worth considering. (i) policies should account for factors common to GCC countries, as ignoring them makes co 2 effects of financial development misleading. (ii) an upturn in financial development leads to less emissions than a downturn in it. This asymmetric effect implies that policies should boost financial development. (iii) co 2 in GCC countries may converge to an identical relationship in the long run implying that there are common climate initiatives and projects that GCC authorities should work on jointly.

Environmental Economics and Policy StudiesVol. 28(1)
George Washington University (US), Korea University (KR), King Abdullah Petroleum Studies and Research Center (SA), Hamad bin Khalifa University (QA), Baku Engineering University (AZ)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
6.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.