StratoMod: predicting sequencing and variant calling errors with interpretable machine learning

Despite the variety in sequencing platforms, mappers, and variant callers, no single pipeline is optimal across the entire human genome. Therefore, developers, clinicians, and researchers need to make tradeoffs when designing pipelines for their application. Currently, assessing such tradeoffs relies on intuition about how a certain pipeline will perform in a given genomic context. We present StratoMod, which addresses this problem using an interpretable machine-learning classifier to predict germline variant calling errors in a data-driven manner. We show StratoMod can precisely predict recall using Hifi or Illumina and leverage StratoMod's interpretability to measure contributions from difficult-to-map and homopolymer regions for each respective outcome. Furthermore, we use Statomod to assess the effect of mismapping on predicted recall using linear vs. graph-based references, and identify the hard-to-map regions where graph-based methods excelled and by how much. For these we utilize our draft benchmark based on the Q100 HG002 assembly, which contains previously-inaccessible difficult regions. Furthermore, StratoMod presents a new method of predicting clinically relevant variants likely to be missed, which is an improvement over current pipelines which only filter variants likely to be false. We anticipate this being useful for performing precise risk-reward analyses when designing variant calling pipelines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Biology
Published
2024-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-024-06981-1
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Genomics and Rare Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

StratoMod: predicting sequencing and variant calling errors with interpretable machine learning

Fritz Joachim Sedlazeck, Justin M. Zook, Peter D. Tonner, Nathan D. Olson et al.
4 citations
Communications Biology
Genomics and Rare Diseases
2.20
article

StratoMod: predicting sequencing and variant calling errors with interpretable machine learning

Fritz Joachim Sedlazeck, Justin M. Zook, Peter D. Tonner, Nathan D. Olson, Nathan Dwarshuis, Justin Wagner
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Despite the variety in sequencing platforms, mappers, and variant callers, no single pipeline is optimal across the entire human genome. Therefore, developers, clinicians, and researchers need to make tradeoffs when designing pipelines for their application. Currently, assessing such tradeoffs relies on intuition about how a certain pipeline will perform in a given genomic context. We present StratoMod, which addresses this problem using an interpretable machine-learning classifier to predict germline variant calling errors in a data-driven manner. We show StratoMod can precisely predict recall using Hifi or Illumina and leverage StratoMod's interpretability to measure contributions from difficult-to-map and homopolymer regions for each respective outcome. Furthermore, we use Statomod to assess the effect of mismapping on predicted recall using linear vs. graph-based references, and identify the hard-to-map regions where graph-based methods excelled and by how much. For these we utilize our draft benchmark based on the Q100 HG002 assembly, which contains previously-inaccessible difficult regions. Furthermore, StratoMod presents a new method of predicting clinically relevant variants likely to be missed, which is an improvement over current pipelines which only filter variants likely to be false. We anticipate this being useful for performing precise risk-reward analyses when designing variant calling pipelines.

Communications BiologyVol. 7(1)
National Institute of Standards and Technology (US), Baylor College of Medicine (US), Material Measurement Laboratory (US), Rice University (US)
National Institute of Standards and Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Genomics and Rare Diseases
2.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.