Best practices for estimating and reporting epidemiological delay distributions of infectious diseases

Epidemiological delays are key quantities that inform public health policy and clinical practice. They are used as inputs for mathematical and statistical models, which in turn can guide control strategies. In recent work, we found that censoring, right truncation, and dynamical bias were rarely addressed correctly when estimating delays and that these biases were large enough to have knock-on impacts across a large number of use cases. Here, we formulate a checklist of best practices for estimating and reporting epidemiological delays. We also provide a flowchart to guide practitioners based on their data. Our examples are focused on the incubation period and serial interval due to their importance in outbreak response and modeling, but our recommendations are applicable to other delays. The recommendations, which are based on the literature and our experience estimating epidemiological delay distributions during outbreak responses, can help improve the robustness and utility of reported estimates and provide guidance for the evaluation of estimates for downstream use in transmission models or other analyses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS Computational Biology
Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012520
Citations
21
Primary Topic
COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.30

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Best practices for estimating and reporting epidemiological delay distributions of infectious diseases

Simon Cauchemez, Natalie M. Linton, Kelly Charniga, Thomas Ward et al.
21 citations
PLoS Computational Biology
COVID-19 epidemiological studies
8.30
article

Best practices for estimating and reporting epidemiological delay distributions of infectious diseases

Simon Cauchemez, Natalie M. Linton, Kelly Charniga, Thomas Ward, Juliet R.C. Pulliam, Katelyn M. Gostic, Anne Cori, Sebastian Funk, Christopher E. Overton, Andrei R. Akhmetzhanov, Jonathan Dushoff, Adrian Lison, Sam Abbott, Sang Woo Park
article en
21 citations

Abstract

Epidemiological delays are key quantities that inform public health policy and clinical practice. They are used as inputs for mathematical and statistical models, which in turn can guide control strategies. In recent work, we found that censoring, right truncation, and dynamical bias were rarely addressed correctly when estimating delays and that these biases were large enough to have knock-on impacts across a large number of use cases. Here, we formulate a checklist of best practices for estimating and reporting epidemiological delays. We also provide a flowchart to guide practitioners based on their data. Our examples are focused on the incubation period and serial interval due to their importance in outbreak response and modeling, but our recommendations are applicable to other delays. The recommendations, which are based on the literature and our experience estimating epidemiological delay distributions during outbreak responses, can help improve the robustness and utility of reported estimates and provide guidance for the evaluation of estimates for downstream use in transmission models or other analyses.

PLoS Computational BiologyVol. 20(10)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), University of Liverpool (GB), Institut Pasteur (FR), National Taiwan University (TW), Princeton University (US), Université Paris Cité (FR), Hokkaido University (JP), University of Manchester (GB), Public Health England (GB), ETH Zurich (CH), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), The Centers (US), Imperial College London (GB), McMaster University (CA)
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Imperial College London, Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Medical Research Council, European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
COVID-19 epidemiological studies
8.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.