Co-creating a community visioning methodology for energy transitions: Principles, practices, and reflections

Visions of energy futures produced via co-created methodologies can provide robust alternatives to the prevailing imaginaries held by international and state actors – crucial for sustaining progress towards energy transitions that meet community needs and realities. This paper explores the co-creative design of a methodology for community visions for energy transitions. Insights are drawn from the development and outputs of a collaborative workshop aimed at adapting community visioning to different local contexts with four partners from across Europe. We analyse empirical evidence, including transcripts of conversations with participating local authorities and NGO representatives and resources prepared for the workshop, to detail how collaboration proceeded. The results highlight that practices fostering inclusion, mutual learning, and relationship building can give partners ownership over visioning to better ensure that its design reflects local, situated knowledges and is well suited to communities. However, the messy, human nature of co-creation requires commitment to flexibility and ongoing dialogue. Overall, the experiences highlighted in this paper serve as a valuable resource for future researchers and practitioners interested in exploring how to further energy system transformation and support community-driven local energy transitions. • For fairer energy futures, we must examine how futures are envisioned. • This paper explores the co-creative design of community visioning. • Co-creative visioning design identifies locally-specific ways to discuss energy. • Researchers’ attention to context and flexibility can support energy transition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Research & Social Science
Published
2024-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103783
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.12

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Co-creating a community visioning methodology for energy transitions: Principles, practices, and reflections

Rachel McArdle, Melanie Rohse, Frances Fahy, Emily Gray
7 citations
Energy Research & Social Science
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
5.12
article

Co-creating a community visioning methodology for energy transitions: Principles, practices, and reflections

Rachel McArdle, Melanie Rohse, Frances Fahy, Emily Gray
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Visions of energy futures produced via co-created methodologies can provide robust alternatives to the prevailing imaginaries held by international and state actors – crucial for sustaining progress towards energy transitions that meet community needs and realities. This paper explores the co-creative design of a methodology for community visions for energy transitions. Insights are drawn from the development and outputs of a collaborative workshop aimed at adapting community visioning to different local contexts with four partners from across Europe. We analyse empirical evidence, including transcripts of conversations with participating local authorities and NGO representatives and resources prepared for the workshop, to detail how collaboration proceeded. The results highlight that practices fostering inclusion, mutual learning, and relationship building can give partners ownership over visioning to better ensure that its design reflects local, situated knowledges and is well suited to communities. However, the messy, human nature of co-creation requires commitment to flexibility and ongoing dialogue. Overall, the experiences highlighted in this paper serve as a valuable resource for future researchers and practitioners interested in exploring how to further energy system transformation and support community-driven local energy transitions. • For fairer energy futures, we must examine how futures are envisioned. • This paper explores the co-creative design of community visioning. • Co-creative visioning design identifies locally-specific ways to discuss energy. • Researchers’ attention to context and flexibility can support energy transition.

Energy Research & Social ScienceVol. 118
University College Dublin (IE), Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE), Anglia Ruskin University (GB)
Horizon 2020
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
5.12
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.