Rethinking Measures and Mortality Attribution in Health Care: The ENT Example

National performance metrics ultimately enhance patient decision-making and promote meaningful improvements in health care delivery, which makes having valid and reliable measures essential. This study examined US News and World Report metrics from 2019 to 2012 and used electronic health record data, combined with detailed chart review across 3 in-system hospitals, to assess the provision of care compared to the attribution of patients assigned to the ear, nose, and throat (ENT) mortality group. Of the initial 47 ENT-attributed deaths, 23 of those were verified, dimensioning the mortality rate from 1.7% to just 0.8%. These results underscore the necessity of rethinking measures and mortality attribution methodologies to be more accurate. Current methods use Medicare Severity Diagnosis Related Group billing coding to map the attribution. We suggest transitioning away from specialty ranking approaches and towards a procedure and condition "rating" approach to ensure that these ranking types capture data about the provision of care within a given encounter.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Otolaryngology
Published
2024-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.1015
Primary Topic
Healthcare Policy and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rethinking Measures and Mortality Attribution in Health Care: The ENT Example

Terri L. Menser, Lorenzo J. Olivero, Richard A. Taylor, Samip Patel et al.
Otolaryngology
Healthcare Policy and Management
article

Rethinking Measures and Mortality Attribution in Health Care: The ENT Example

Terri L. Menser, Lorenzo J. Olivero, Richard A. Taylor, Samip Patel, Hemant S. Murthy, Bruce E. Pollock, Migyung Lee, JORGE SINCLAIR DE FRÍAS, Pablo Moreno Franco, Pramod Kumar Guru, Răzvan M. Chirilă, Stephanie S. Anderson
article en

Abstract

National performance metrics ultimately enhance patient decision-making and promote meaningful improvements in health care delivery, which makes having valid and reliable measures essential. This study examined US News and World Report metrics from 2019 to 2012 and used electronic health record data, combined with detailed chart review across 3 in-system hospitals, to assess the provision of care compared to the attribution of patients assigned to the ear, nose, and throat (ENT) mortality group. Of the initial 47 ENT-attributed deaths, 23 of those were verified, dimensioning the mortality rate from 1.7% to just 0.8%. These results underscore the necessity of rethinking measures and mortality attribution methodologies to be more accurate. Current methods use Medicare Severity Diagnosis Related Group billing coding to map the attribution. We suggest transitioning away from specialty ranking approaches and towards a procedure and condition "rating" approach to ensure that these ranking types capture data about the provision of care within a given encounter.

OtolaryngologyVol. 171(6)
Jacksonville College (US), WinnMed (US), Mayo Clinic in Florida (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Healthcare Policy and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.