Comparison of item characteristic analysis models of reading literacy test with polytomous Item Response Theory

This study aims to compare the analysis model of the characteristics of reading literacy items with the polytomous item response theory, which uses the Graded Response Model (GRM), Partial Credit Model (PCM), Generalized Partial Credit Model (GPCM), and Nominal Reasons Model (NRM). This research is quantitative research in nature, and secondary data were used from about 1000 test takers’ responses to reading literacy items in the 2018 reading literacy study analyzed with the R program. This model comparison was carried out so that the analysis results obtained were more accurate in representing the level of reading literacy skills in Indonesia. The results show that the GPCM model is the fit model with an AIC value of 23753.89 and a BIC value of 24042.45, and the number of suitable testlets is 7 out of a total of 7 testlets. Based on the relationship between information function scores and SEM, reading literacy items provide higher information when participants’ abilities range between -2.3 and +2.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
REID (Research and Evaluation in Education)
Published
2024-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v10i2.77852
Primary Topic
Educational Technology and Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of item characteristic analysis models of reading literacy test with polytomous Item Response Theory

Rimajon Sotlikova, Septinda Rima Dewanti, Heri Retnawati, Anisya Septiana et al.
REID (Research and Evaluation in Education)
Educational Technology and Assessment
article

Comparison of item characteristic analysis models of reading literacy test with polytomous Item Response Theory

Rimajon Sotlikova, Septinda Rima Dewanti, Heri Retnawati, Anisya Septiana, Firyal Nabila Harsana, Rogers Andrew Lumenyela, Maulana Fatahillah Adzima
article en

Abstract

This study aims to compare the analysis model of the characteristics of reading literacy items with the polytomous item response theory, which uses the Graded Response Model (GRM), Partial Credit Model (PCM), Generalized Partial Credit Model (GPCM), and Nominal Reasons Model (NRM). This research is quantitative research in nature, and secondary data were used from about 1000 test takers’ responses to reading literacy items in the 2018 reading literacy study analyzed with the R program. This model comparison was carried out so that the analysis results obtained were more accurate in representing the level of reading literacy skills in Indonesia. The results show that the GPCM model is the fit model with an AIC value of 23753.89 and a BIC value of 24042.45, and the number of suitable testlets is 7 out of a total of 7 testlets. Based on the relationship between information function scores and SEM, reading literacy items provide higher information when participants’ abilities range between -2.3 and +2.

REID (Research and Evaluation in Education)Vol. 10(2)
Yogyakarta State University (ID), Queensland University of Technology (AU), University of Manchester (GB), Institute of Rural Development Planning (TZ), University of California, Berkeley (US), Webster University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Educational Technology and Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of item characteristic analysis models of reading literacy test with polytomous Item Response Theory — Rimajon Sotlikova, Septinda Rima Dewanti, et al. · REID (Research and Evaluation in Education) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS