https://www.jnacs.com/article_204121_f66de375b6bfd2ce855231d4d8bb32b1.pdf

The present study aims to determine the continuous care model's effect on cancer patients' self-efficacy. This randomized controlled trial study, employing a pre-test-post-test design with two groups, was conducted on cancer patients referred to chemotherapy centers in Gorgan, Iran, in 2020. The sampling method employed in this study was random allocation. Initially, the researcher compiled a list of eligible research units. Subsequently, using a simple random process, the research units were divided into 15 in the test group and 15 in the control group. The data collection tools in this research included demographic information (age, gender, marital status, education, occupation, and duration of illness) and the Chronic Disease Self-Efficacy Scales (CDSES). A total of 30 participants were divided into intervention and control groups. The average self-efficacy of the research units before the intervention was 144.8 (SD=11.53) in the test group and 147.97 (SD=11.97) in the control group. The independent t-test revealed no significant difference between the two groups before the intervention (P=0.47). Post-intervention, the average self-efficacy was 168.2 (SD=9.31) in the test group and 155.6 (SD=8.3) in the control group. The independent t-test showed a significant difference between the two groups (P=0.001). Consequently, it is recommended that nursing models and theories, particularly the continuous care model, be incorporated into structured and planned educational programs to provide nursing care, especially supportive care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Nursing Advances in Clinical Sciences.
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.32598/jnacs.2408.1050
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Well-being
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

https://www.jnacs.com/article_204121_f66de375b6bfd2ce855231d4d8bb32b1.pdf

Somayeh Mashmooli, Mehran Shahraki, Fatemeh Bameri, Maryam Taheri
Journal of Nursing Advances in Clinical Sciences.
Mental Health and Well-being
article

https://www.jnacs.com/article_204121_f66de375b6bfd2ce855231d4d8bb32b1.pdf

Somayeh Mashmooli, Mehran Shahraki, Fatemeh Bameri, Maryam Taheri
article en

Abstract

The present study aims to determine the continuous care model's effect on cancer patients' self-efficacy. This randomized controlled trial study, employing a pre-test-post-test design with two groups, was conducted on cancer patients referred to chemotherapy centers in Gorgan, Iran, in 2020. The sampling method employed in this study was random allocation. Initially, the researcher compiled a list of eligible research units. Subsequently, using a simple random process, the research units were divided into 15 in the test group and 15 in the control group. The data collection tools in this research included demographic information (age, gender, marital status, education, occupation, and duration of illness) and the Chronic Disease Self-Efficacy Scales (CDSES). A total of 30 participants were divided into intervention and control groups. The average self-efficacy of the research units before the intervention was 144.8 (SD=11.53) in the test group and 147.97 (SD=11.97) in the control group. The independent t-test revealed no significant difference between the two groups before the intervention (P=0.47). Post-intervention, the average self-efficacy was 168.2 (SD=9.31) in the test group and 155.6 (SD=8.3) in the control group. The independent t-test showed a significant difference between the two groups (P=0.001). Consequently, it is recommended that nursing models and theories, particularly the continuous care model, be incorporated into structured and planned educational programs to provide nursing care, especially supportive care.

Journal of Nursing Advances in Clinical Sciences.Vol. 1(4)
Golestan University (IR), Odense University Hospital (DK), Islamic Azad University, Zahedan Branch (IR), Golestan University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Mental Health and Well-being
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.