Comparing Cesarean Scar Defect Incidence After Locked and Unlocked Repair Methods Among Primiparous Patients: A Randomized Double-blinded Trial
We have found no significant differences in the RMT and CSD prevalence between two-layered locked and unlocked uterine closure techniques, while the scar depth was greater in the unlocked group. Nonetheless, future randomized trials implementing larger sample sizes are required to precisely compare the outcomes of the double-layer locked and unlocked uterine suturing techniques.
Authors
- Mohammadamin Parsaei (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7764-0319)
- Azadeh Tarafdari (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4591-9507)
- Sedigheh Hantoushzadeh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3779-9218)
- Mahdieh Nazarpour
- Nikan Zargardzadeh
Institutions
- Boston Children's Hospital (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Imam Khomeini Hospital (IR)
- Tehran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Family & Reproductive Health
- Published
- 2024-10-13
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.18502/jfrh.v18i3.16655
- Primary Topic
- Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00