Adverse Possession Laws: A Comparison Between Taxation Law and Property Law

This paper explores the intricate relationship between taxation and adverse possession, focusing on the implications for government revenue. Adverse possession allows individuals to claim legal title to property after continuous, open, and hostile occupation for a statutory period, while taxation ensures that property owners contribute to government finances through property taxes. The interaction of these legal frameworks presents challenges, particularly regarding unpaid taxes during the possession period and the responsibility of tax compliance. The potential for tax arrears, tax liens, and property sales to recover lost revenue are critical issues for governments seeking to maintain revenue stability. Additionally, the ambiguity surrounding taxpayer responsibility during adverse possession can lead to gaps in tax collection. This paper analyzes these challenges and highlights potential solutions, including legislative reforms requiring tax payments by adverse possessors and improved tax collection mechanisms to safeguard public revenue. By examining the overlap between adverse possession and taxation law, this paper aims to provide insights into preserving government revenue while addressing the complexities of land ownership transitions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
Published
2024-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i05.28457
Primary Topic
Legal and Constitutional Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adverse Possession Laws: A Comparison Between Taxation Law and Property Law

PRATYUSH PRAKARSH -, UJJWAL RAJ -, KRITI NAND -, SIDDHARTH KAMBLE - et al.
International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
Legal and Constitutional Studies
article

Adverse Possession Laws: A Comparison Between Taxation Law and Property Law

PRATYUSH PRAKARSH -, UJJWAL RAJ -, KRITI NAND -, SIDDHARTH KAMBLE -, SATYAM KUMAR -
article en

Abstract

This paper explores the intricate relationship between taxation and adverse possession, focusing on the implications for government revenue. Adverse possession allows individuals to claim legal title to property after continuous, open, and hostile occupation for a statutory period, while taxation ensures that property owners contribute to government finances through property taxes. The interaction of these legal frameworks presents challenges, particularly regarding unpaid taxes during the possession period and the responsibility of tax compliance. The potential for tax arrears, tax liens, and property sales to recover lost revenue are critical issues for governments seeking to maintain revenue stability. Additionally, the ambiguity surrounding taxpayer responsibility during adverse possession can lead to gaps in tax collection. This paper analyzes these challenges and highlights potential solutions, including legislative reforms requiring tax payments by adverse possessors and improved tax collection mechanisms to safeguard public revenue. By examining the overlap between adverse possession and taxation law, this paper aims to provide insights into preserving government revenue while addressing the complexities of land ownership transitions.

International Journal For Multidisciplinary ResearchVol. 6(5)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Legal and Constitutional Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Adverse Possession Laws: A Comparison Between Taxation Law and Property Law — PRATYUSH PRAKARSH -, UJJWAL RAJ -, et al. · International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS