Modelling uncertainty in <i>P</i>-wave arrival-times retrieved from DAS data: case-studies from 15 fibre optic cables

SUMMARY Distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) technology enables the detection of waves generated by seismic events, generally as uniaxial strain/strain rate time-series observed for dense, subsequent, portions of a Fibre Optic Cable (FOC). Despite the advantages in measurement density, data quality is often affected by uniaxial signal polarization, site effects and cable coupling, beyond the physical energy decay with distance. To better understand the relative importance of these factors for data inversion, we attempt a first modelling of noise patterns affecting DAS arrival times for a set of seismic events. The focus is on assessing the impact of noise statistics, together with the geometry of the problem, on epicentral location uncertainties. For this goal, we consider 15 ‘real-world’ cases of DAS arrays with different geometry, each associated with a seismic event of known location. We compute synthetic P-wave arrival times and contaminate them with four statistical distributions of the noise. We also estimate P-wave arrival times on real waveforms using a standard seismological picker. Eventually, these five data sets are inverted using a Markov chain Monte Carlo method, which offers the evaluation of the relative event location differences in terms of posterior probability density (PPD). Results highlight how cable geometry influences the shape, extent and directionality of the PPDs. However, synthetic tests demonstrate how noise assumptions on arrival times often have important effects on location uncertainties. Moreover, for half of the analysed case studies, the observed and synthetic locations are more similar when considering noise sources that are independent of the geometrical characteristics of the arrays. Thus, the results indicate that axial polarization, site conditions and cable coupling, beyond other intrinsic features (e.g. optical noise), are likely responsible for the complex distribution of DAS arrival times. Overall, the noise sensitivity of DAS suggests caution when applying geometry-only-based approaches for the a priori evaluation of novel monitoring systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geophysical Journal International
Published
2024-10-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggae364
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Advanced Photonic Communication Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.67

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modelling uncertainty in P-wave arrival-times retrieved from DAS data: case-studies from 15 fibre optic cables

Emanuele Bozzi, Torsten Dahm, Alan F. Baird, Fabian Walter et al.
8 citations
Geophysical Journal International
Advanced Photonic Communication Systems
1.67
article

Modelling uncertainty in P-wave arrival-times retrieved from DAS data: case-studies from 15 fibre optic cables

Emanuele Bozzi, Torsten Dahm, Alan F. Baird, Fabian Walter, Tieyuan Zhu, Andreas Fichtner, Biondo Biondi, Carlos Becerril, Marius Paul Isken, Sara Klaasen, Nicola Piana Agostinetti, Arantza Ugalde, Junzhu Shen, Gilberto Saccorotti, Takuya Nishimura, Shuai Yuan, Patrick Paitz
article en
8 citations

Abstract

SUMMARY Distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) technology enables the detection of waves generated by seismic events, generally as uniaxial strain/strain rate time-series observed for dense, subsequent, portions of a Fibre Optic Cable (FOC). Despite the advantages in measurement density, data quality is often affected by uniaxial signal polarization, site effects and cable coupling, beyond the physical energy decay with distance. To better understand the relative importance of these factors for data inversion, we attempt a first modelling of noise patterns affecting DAS arrival times for a set of seismic events. The focus is on assessing the impact of noise statistics, together with the geometry of the problem, on epicentral location uncertainties. For this goal, we consider 15 ‘real-world’ cases of DAS arrays with different geometry, each associated with a seismic event of known location. We compute synthetic P-wave arrival times and contaminate them with four statistical distributions of the noise. We also estimate P-wave arrival times on real waveforms using a standard seismological picker. Eventually, these five data sets are inverted using a Markov chain Monte Carlo method, which offers the evaluation of the relative event location differences in terms of posterior probability density (PPD). Results highlight how cable geometry influences the shape, extent and directionality of the PPDs. However, synthetic tests demonstrate how noise assumptions on arrival times often have important effects on location uncertainties. Moreover, for half of the analysed case studies, the observed and synthetic locations are more similar when considering noise sources that are independent of the geometrical characteristics of the arrays. Thus, the results indicate that axial polarization, site conditions and cable coupling, beyond other intrinsic features (e.g. optical noise), are likely responsible for the complex distribution of DAS arrival times. Overall, the noise sensitivity of DAS suggests caution when applying geometry-only-based approaches for the a priori evaluation of novel monitoring systems.

Geophysical Journal InternationalVol. 239(3)
Pennsylvania State University (US), Tohoku University (JP), Université Côte d'Azur (FR), Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (CH), Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (IT), ETH Zurich (CH), Institut Català de Ciències del Clima (ES), Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur (FR), Institut de Ciències del Mar (ES), GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences (DE), Norsar (NO), University of Milano-Bicocca (IT), Stanford University (US)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Advanced Photonic Communication Systems
1.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.