PubMed captures more fine-grained bibliographic data on scientific commentary than Web of Science: a comparative analysis
Considering the impact and controversy of commented works, the accuracy of comments and the depth of network interactions, PubMed potentially serves as a valuable resource in evidence appraisal and detection of controversial issues compared with WoS.
Authors
- Kai Zhang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9808-3646)
- Shuang Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3879-9519)
- Jian Du (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8436-778X)
Institutions
- Peking University (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- BMJ Health & Care Informatics
- Published
- 2024-10-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101017
- Citations
- 5
- Primary Topic
- scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.31
Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China