Using <scp>ELISA</scp> to detect pathogen antibodies in wild mammal carcasses: a systematic literature review

Abstract Carcasses of wild mammals provide convenient samples for wildlife disease investigators. Specifically, antibodies can persist in the blood and tissues of animals up to a few days after death and can provide information on exposure to specific pathogens, including microorganisms with zoonotic implications, such as Toxoplasma gondii , Trichinella spp., Brucella spp., and Mycobacterium spp. Although screening samples from decaying wildlife for antibodies is not a new method, an overview of the literature with clear recommendations on best practices is lacking. Here, we present results from a systematic review of 115 studies using enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to detect pathogen antibodies in wild mammals across 298 individual research projects. We discuss the range of mammalian hosts and the pathogens most represented in the literature and suggest improvements to consider when using samples from decaying animals for seroinvestigation. Our results indicate that the most examined mammals were artiodactyl ungulates and that antibodies against the bacteria Brucella spp. are those most examined to date, followed by the protozoan Toxoplasma gondii , malignant catarrhal fever virus, Schmallenberg orthobunyavirus, and the coccidian Neospora caninum. The effect of haemolysis in serum samples on ELISA results was considered in only 3.7% of the research projects we reviewed, sample size decisions were not outlined in 83% of research projects, and half of the projects did not examine seroprevalence in different age classes. Nevertheless, these details are important for replicability and accurate interpretation of results. We highlight the benefits and limitations of detecting antibodies against pathogens in carcasses from wild mammalian groups. Wild mammals are reservoirs for a wide range of pathogens including those with zoonotic potential and investigating their carcasses can help wildlife investigators to better understand the epidemiology of many diseases with implications for wildlife, livestock, and human health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mammal Review
Published
2024-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/mam.12379
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using ELISA to detect pathogen antibodies in wild mammal carcasses: a systematic literature review

Ian O’Connor, Allan D. McDevitt, Katie O’Dwyer, Paule-Emilie Ruy
1 citations
Mammal Review
Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology
0.57
article

Using ELISA to detect pathogen antibodies in wild mammal carcasses: a systematic literature review

Ian O’Connor, Allan D. McDevitt, Katie O’Dwyer, Paule-Emilie Ruy
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Carcasses of wild mammals provide convenient samples for wildlife disease investigators. Specifically, antibodies can persist in the blood and tissues of animals up to a few days after death and can provide information on exposure to specific pathogens, including microorganisms with zoonotic implications, such as Toxoplasma gondii , Trichinella spp., Brucella spp., and Mycobacterium spp. Although screening samples from decaying wildlife for antibodies is not a new method, an overview of the literature with clear recommendations on best practices is lacking. Here, we present results from a systematic review of 115 studies using enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to detect pathogen antibodies in wild mammals across 298 individual research projects. We discuss the range of mammalian hosts and the pathogens most represented in the literature and suggest improvements to consider when using samples from decaying animals for seroinvestigation. Our results indicate that the most examined mammals were artiodactyl ungulates and that antibodies against the bacteria Brucella spp. are those most examined to date, followed by the protozoan Toxoplasma gondii , malignant catarrhal fever virus, Schmallenberg orthobunyavirus, and the coccidian Neospora caninum. The effect of haemolysis in serum samples on ELISA results was considered in only 3.7% of the research projects we reviewed, sample size decisions were not outlined in 83% of research projects, and half of the projects did not examine seroprevalence in different age classes. Nevertheless, these details are important for replicability and accurate interpretation of results. We highlight the benefits and limitations of detecting antibodies against pathogens in carcasses from wild mammalian groups. Wild mammals are reservoirs for a wide range of pathogens including those with zoonotic potential and investigating their carcasses can help wildlife investigators to better understand the epidemiology of many diseases with implications for wildlife, livestock, and human health.

Mammal ReviewVol. 55(3)
Atlantic Technological University (IE), Galway-Mayo Institute of Technology (IE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology
0.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.