Evaluation of Vaginoscopic versus Traditional Office Hysteroscopy in Nulliparous Infertile Patients (prospective Cohort study)

Background: Diagnostic hysteroscopy is a minimally invasive technique that provides immediate direct vision of the uterine cavity. Therefore, in order to improve the acceptability and comfort level of office hysteroscopy and to increase the success of the outcome, we compared the vaginoscopic and standard hysteroscopy methods in this study. Zagazig University has never conducted research in this area before. Methods: This prospective cohort study was conducted at Gynecology Outpatients, Obstetrics and Gynecology Department at Zagazig University Maternity Hospital. The study included 108 patients divided into 2 groups, vaginoscopic and traditional hysteroscopic groups, and then the outcomes were compared between the 2 studied groups. Results: Those who underwent Traditional hysteroscopy had more pain, higher procedural time median values than vaginoscopic hysteroscopy. Conclusion: Compared to the standard hysteroscopy using the speculum, the vaginoscopic approach is more successful as it is quicker, less painful and better tolerated. It should be preferred in an outpatient setting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zagazig University Medical Journal
Published
2024-10-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21608/zumj.2024.322875.3593
Primary Topic
Gynecological conditions and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Vaginoscopic versus Traditional Office Hysteroscopy in Nulliparous Infertile Patients (prospective Cohort study)

Mahmoud Mahrous, Waleed M. Etman, Anwar Ezzat Ismail, Mohamed Elhusseny Elkadosi
Zagazig University Medical Journal
Gynecological conditions and treatments
article

Evaluation of Vaginoscopic versus Traditional Office Hysteroscopy in Nulliparous Infertile Patients (prospective Cohort study)

Mahmoud Mahrous, Waleed M. Etman, Anwar Ezzat Ismail, Mohamed Elhusseny Elkadosi
article en

Abstract

Background: Diagnostic hysteroscopy is a minimally invasive technique that provides immediate direct vision of the uterine cavity. Therefore, in order to improve the acceptability and comfort level of office hysteroscopy and to increase the success of the outcome, we compared the vaginoscopic and standard hysteroscopy methods in this study. Zagazig University has never conducted research in this area before. Methods: This prospective cohort study was conducted at Gynecology Outpatients, Obstetrics and Gynecology Department at Zagazig University Maternity Hospital. The study included 108 patients divided into 2 groups, vaginoscopic and traditional hysteroscopic groups, and then the outcomes were compared between the 2 studied groups. Results: Those who underwent Traditional hysteroscopy had more pain, higher procedural time median values than vaginoscopic hysteroscopy. Conclusion: Compared to the standard hysteroscopy using the speculum, the vaginoscopic approach is more successful as it is quicker, less painful and better tolerated. It should be preferred in an outpatient setting.

Zagazig University Medical JournalVol. 0(0)
Zagazig University (EG)
Zero hunger, Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Gynecological conditions and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.