Reduced Misoprostol Regimen versus Standard Misoprostol Regimen for Induction of Second Trimester Abortion in Patients with Previous Cesarean Section Scar

Background: There has been a debate concerning the use of misoprostol for mid-trimester (13-26 weeks) pregnancy termination in women with prior cesarean scars due to concerns regarding a potential higher risk of uterine rupture. Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of two misoprostol regimens (400 mcg misoprostol versus 200 mcg misoprostol) for 2nd-trimester pregnancy termination in individuals with a prior cesarean section scar. Patients and methods: A prospective randomized study included one hundred and seventy-six patients at 13-26 weeks gestation with previous one cesarean section who were scheduled for pregnancy termination using misoprostol. Participants were randomly divided into two equal groups. Group A (standard misoprostol regimen, 88 patients) received 400 mcg of misoprostol vaginally every 4 hours until the fetus was expelled, and Group B (reduced misoprostol regimen, 88 patients) received 200 mcg of misoprostol vaginally every 4 hours until the fetus was expelled. Primary outcomes were time to abortion and complete abortion rates, secondary outcomes were side effect and complications. Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding demographic data. The only documented advantage of standard misoprostol regimen in the current study was significantly shorter induction-abortion interval (28.26 ±2.52 hours) versus 36.6±2.16 hours in reduced misoprostol group. However, reduced misoprostol regimen has comparable complete abortion rates to standard misoprostol regimen with no significant difference (75% and 84.1% respectively, p=0.13). Additionally, there were no significant differences between groups regarding the need of curettage for incomplete abortion. Conclusion: Low-dose vaginal misoprostol administration seems to be beneficial for terminating a 2nd-trimester pregnancy in women with a prior cesarean scar without causing side effects or complications.

Publication Details

Journal
The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21608/ejhm.2024.384070
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Contraception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reduced Misoprostol Regimen versus Standard Misoprostol Regimen for Induction of Second Trimester Abortion in Patients with Previous Cesarean Section Scar

The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine
Reproductive Health and Contraception
article

Reduced Misoprostol Regimen versus Standard Misoprostol Regimen for Induction of Second Trimester Abortion in Patients with Previous Cesarean Section Scar

article en

Abstract

Background: There has been a debate concerning the use of misoprostol for mid-trimester (13-26 weeks) pregnancy termination in women with prior cesarean scars due to concerns regarding a potential higher risk of uterine rupture. Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of two misoprostol regimens (400 mcg misoprostol versus 200 mcg misoprostol) for 2nd-trimester pregnancy termination in individuals with a prior cesarean section scar. Patients and methods: A prospective randomized study included one hundred and seventy-six patients at 13-26 weeks gestation with previous one cesarean section who were scheduled for pregnancy termination using misoprostol. Participants were randomly divided into two equal groups. Group A (standard misoprostol regimen, 88 patients) received 400 mcg of misoprostol vaginally every 4 hours until the fetus was expelled, and Group B (reduced misoprostol regimen, 88 patients) received 200 mcg of misoprostol vaginally every 4 hours until the fetus was expelled. Primary outcomes were time to abortion and complete abortion rates, secondary outcomes were side effect and complications. Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding demographic data. The only documented advantage of standard misoprostol regimen in the current study was significantly shorter induction-abortion interval (28.26 ±2.52 hours) versus 36.6±2.16 hours in reduced misoprostol group. However, reduced misoprostol regimen has comparable complete abortion rates to standard misoprostol regimen with no significant difference (75% and 84.1% respectively, p=0.13). Additionally, there were no significant differences between groups regarding the need of curettage for incomplete abortion. Conclusion: Low-dose vaginal misoprostol administration seems to be beneficial for terminating a 2nd-trimester pregnancy in women with a prior cesarean scar without causing side effects or complications.

The Egyptian Journal of Hospital MedicineVol. 97(1)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Reproductive Health and Contraception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.