Refinement Techniques for Male Chest Definition Using Ultrasound-Assisted Liposuction: A 4-Year-Experience
Background: This study investigates the aesthetic outcomesand safety of ultrasound-assisted liposuction (UAL)in male chest definition for gynecomastia. Recognizing theimportance of patient satisfaction and safety, the research exploresthe integration of UAL with a systematic zoning strategybased on gynecomastia severity.Objectives: The primary aim is to assess aesthetic outcomespost-surgery, with specific objectives focused on gynecomastiaseverity classification, pre-and post-operativeasymmetry, chest anthropometry changes, surgical procedures,complications, and patient satisfaction.Patients and Methods: A cohort of 42 male participantsunderwent UAL for gynecomastia, with demographic data,severity classification, and chronic illness recorded. Pre- andpost-operative asymmetry, chest anthropometry, surgical procedures,complications, and patient satisfaction were meticulouslyevaluated.Results: Demographically, the cohort exhibited a meanage of 33.25 years and a BMI of 27.95. Gynecomastia severityvaried, with 9.5% fatty, 19% glandular, and 71% mixed breastdensity. Significant differences were observed in pre-andpost-operative asymmetry, chest circumference, and areolardiameter. Surgical procedures aligned with established practices, including fat aspirated volume and duration. Complicationswere infrequent, with a 59.5% patient satisfaction rate.Conclusion: The integration of UAL with a systematiczoning strategy demonstrates favorable aesthetic outcomesand safety in male chest definition for gynecomastia. Thestudy supports the continued exploration of UAL in refininggynecomastia procedures, with the need for larger-scale investigations.
Authors
- Mohammad S Al Sabbahi
- Ashraf M. Mostafa
Institutions
- Zagazig University (EG)
Publication Details
- Journal
- The Egyptian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
- Published
- 2024-10-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.21608/ejprs.2024.385097
- Primary Topic
- Male Breast Health Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00