Kindred contexts: archives, archaeology, and the concept of provenance

The disciplines of archives and archaeology are each about the power of context: they both preserve the context wherein objects and records are found and created to aid in their interpretation and take those materials as evidence of context. As context-based disciplines, archives and archaeology foreground the concept of provenance and construct meanings about objects and records from contextual relationships. Context, which is related to but also distinct from provenance, is difficult to disentangle from the latter. While sometimes conflated and used interchangeably, subtle differences distinguish the two concepts. This article explores the ways that archives and archaeology employ the concepts of provenance and context, and the messiness with which they do. Fundamentally, this exercise aims to understand where they might share common ground while enriching discussion and fostering introspection and cross-disciplinary exchange and suggest ways these fields might rethink and extend their own uses of these concepts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archival Science
Published
2024-10-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-024-09459-5
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Digital and Traditional Archives Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.82

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Kindred contexts: archives, archaeology, and the concept of provenance

Bethany Anderson
4 citations
Archival Science
Digital and Traditional Archives Management
7.82
article

Kindred contexts: archives, archaeology, and the concept of provenance

Bethany Anderson
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The disciplines of archives and archaeology are each about the power of context: they both preserve the context wherein objects and records are found and created to aid in their interpretation and take those materials as evidence of context. As context-based disciplines, archives and archaeology foreground the concept of provenance and construct meanings about objects and records from contextual relationships. Context, which is related to but also distinct from provenance, is difficult to disentangle from the latter. While sometimes conflated and used interchangeably, subtle differences distinguish the two concepts. This article explores the ways that archives and archaeology employ the concepts of provenance and context, and the messiness with which they do. Fundamentally, this exercise aims to understand where they might share common ground while enriching discussion and fostering introspection and cross-disciplinary exchange and suggest ways these fields might rethink and extend their own uses of these concepts.

Archival ScienceVol. 24(4)
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Digital and Traditional Archives Management
7.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Kindred contexts: archives, archaeology, and the concept of provenance — Bethany Anderson · Archival Science (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS