Global Governance under Populism: The Challenge of Information Suppression

abstract: Populists’ ideological opposition to global governance is well recognized, yet whether and how these actors systematically undermine international organizations remain unclear. The authors argue that a key means by which populists warp global governance is by distorting scientific information, which is necessary for global responses to many public health and environmental issues. Populists are motivated to withhold or misreport scientific information due to their anti-elite, prostate sovereignty views. Using new data on the source and quality of information provided to international organizations (ios), the authors find that populist leaders are significantly less likely to provide scientific information to ios than are other types of leaders. When they do offer such data, they are less accurate than the information that other sources supply. The authors’ findings suggest that populism may stymie international institutions’ ability to govern in areas of pressing international concern.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
World Politics
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.2024.a939189
Citations
24
Primary Topic
International Development and Aid
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
29.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global Governance under Populism: The Challenge of Information Suppression

Allison Carnegie, Noah Zucker, Richard Clark
24 citations
World Politics
International Development and Aid
29.44
article

Global Governance under Populism: The Challenge of Information Suppression

Allison Carnegie, Noah Zucker, Richard Clark
article en
24 citations

Abstract

abstract: Populists’ ideological opposition to global governance is well recognized, yet whether and how these actors systematically undermine international organizations remain unclear. The authors argue that a key means by which populists warp global governance is by distorting scientific information, which is necessary for global responses to many public health and environmental issues. Populists are motivated to withhold or misreport scientific information due to their anti-elite, prostate sovereignty views. Using new data on the source and quality of information provided to international organizations (ios), the authors find that populist leaders are significantly less likely to provide scientific information to ios than are other types of leaders. When they do offer such data, they are less accurate than the information that other sources supply. The authors’ findings suggest that populism may stymie international institutions’ ability to govern in areas of pressing international concern.

World PoliticsVol. 76(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
International Development and Aid
29.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Global Governance under Populism: The Challenge of Information Suppression — Allison Carnegie, Noah Zucker, et al. · World Politics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS