Crushing responses of carbon/glass hybrid composite tubes under dynamic compressive loads

Abstract In this study, the axial crushing response and energy‐absorbing mechanisms of circular composite tubes, which were reinforced by carbon fiber (C10) and carbon/glass hybrids (C3G4C3), were investigated experimentally and numerically. Both samples exhibited similar crushing responses comprising delamination and intralayer shear failure. The impact kinetic energy is primarily converted into frictional and composite damage energies. C3G4C3 had poorer crashworthiness with a mean crushing force and specific energy absorption of 313.3 kN and 58.0 kJ/kg, which are by 39.3% and 30.8% less, respectively, than those of C10. The influence of glass fiber reinforced polymers (GFRP) content (hybrid ratio) and stacking sequence on tubal crashworthiness was investigated numerically. For composite tubes with a hybrid ratio of 40%, the central distribution of GFRP (C3G4C3) achieved optimal energy absorption performance. Additionally, when GFRP layers were centralized stacked, a reduction of the hybrid ratio from 60% (G3C4G3) to 20% (GC8G) helped improve the crashworthiness of the hybrid tubes, where the mean crushing force increased by 23%. Highlights Impact responses of composite tubes reinforced by carbon fiber and carbon/glass hybrids were investigated experimentally and numerically. Carbon/glass hybrid tubes exhibited lower crashworthiness. The effects of stacking sequence and hybrid ratio on the energy absorption performance were studied.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Polymer Composites
Published
2024-10-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.29127
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Mechanical Behavior of Composites
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.08
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Crushing responses of carbon/glass hybrid composite tubes under dynamic compressive loads

Dongdong Chen, Tao Zhu, Yanfang Wang, Yanwen Liu et al.
4 citations
Polymer Composites
Mechanical Behavior of Composites
1.08
article

Crushing responses of carbon/glass hybrid composite tubes under dynamic compressive loads

Dongdong Chen, Tao Zhu, Yanfang Wang, Yanwen Liu, Shoune Xiao
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract In this study, the axial crushing response and energy‐absorbing mechanisms of circular composite tubes, which were reinforced by carbon fiber (C10) and carbon/glass hybrids (C3G4C3), were investigated experimentally and numerically. Both samples exhibited similar crushing responses comprising delamination and intralayer shear failure. The impact kinetic energy is primarily converted into frictional and composite damage energies. C3G4C3 had poorer crashworthiness with a mean crushing force and specific energy absorption of 313.3 kN and 58.0 kJ/kg, which are by 39.3% and 30.8% less, respectively, than those of C10. The influence of glass fiber reinforced polymers (GFRP) content (hybrid ratio) and stacking sequence on tubal crashworthiness was investigated numerically. For composite tubes with a hybrid ratio of 40%, the central distribution of GFRP (C3G4C3) achieved optimal energy absorption performance. Additionally, when GFRP layers were centralized stacked, a reduction of the hybrid ratio from 60% (G3C4G3) to 20% (GC8G) helped improve the crashworthiness of the hybrid tubes, where the mean crushing force increased by 23%. Highlights Impact responses of composite tubes reinforced by carbon fiber and carbon/glass hybrids were investigated experimentally and numerically. Carbon/glass hybrid tubes exhibited lower crashworthiness. The effects of stacking sequence and hybrid ratio on the energy absorption performance were studied.

Polymer CompositesVol. 46(3)
Southwest Jiaotong University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Mechanical Behavior of Composites
1.08
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.