Hyperparameter Tuning for Optimizing Stunting Classification with KNN, SVM, and Naïve Bayes Algorithms

The purpose of this study is to illuminate and compare the performance of three classifiers, namely Naive Bayes (NB), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), in classifying stunting data. Using evaluation measures such as accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score, the performance of each algorithm is measured before and after hyperparameter adjustment. The experimental results show that SVM provides a strong balance between precision and recall before hyperparameter adjustment, KNN excels in recall, and NB achieves the highest precision. After hyperparameter adjustment, all models show improved performance, with SVM achieving the best accuracy and F1 score. While NB remains highly precise and reduces false positives, KNN continues to win the recall. The results show that hyperparameter adjustment is critical to optimizing algorithm performance and that algorithms should be selected according to specific research objectives to maximize detection accuracy and balance recall and precision.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Tekno Kompak
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33365/jtk.v19i1.4574
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Water Quality Monitoring Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hyperparameter Tuning for Optimizing Stunting Classification with KNN, SVM, and Naïve Bayes Algorithms

Wawan Firgiawan, Dita Yustianisa, Nurrahmi Afiah Nur, Gabrelia Gabrelia
1 citations
Jurnal Tekno Kompak
Water Quality Monitoring Technologies
0.20
article

Hyperparameter Tuning for Optimizing Stunting Classification with KNN, SVM, and Naïve Bayes Algorithms

Wawan Firgiawan, Dita Yustianisa, Nurrahmi Afiah Nur, Gabrelia Gabrelia
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to illuminate and compare the performance of three classifiers, namely Naive Bayes (NB), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), in classifying stunting data. Using evaluation measures such as accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score, the performance of each algorithm is measured before and after hyperparameter adjustment. The experimental results show that SVM provides a strong balance between precision and recall before hyperparameter adjustment, KNN excels in recall, and NB achieves the highest precision. After hyperparameter adjustment, all models show improved performance, with SVM achieving the best accuracy and F1 score. While NB remains highly precise and reduces false positives, KNN continues to win the recall. The results show that hyperparameter adjustment is critical to optimizing algorithm performance and that algorithms should be selected according to specific research objectives to maximize detection accuracy and balance recall and precision.

Jurnal Tekno KompakVol. 19(1)
Universitas Sulawesi Barat (ID)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Water Quality Monitoring Technologies
0.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.