Machine learning for urban land use/ cover mapping: Comparison of artificial neural network, random forest and support vector machine, a case study of Dilla town

<h2>Abstract</h2> <i>The ability to accurately classify land use/cover (LULC) is critical for environmental monitoring and land use planning. This study compares three machine learning algorithms: Artificial Neural Network (ANN),</i> Support <i>Vector Machine (SVM), and Random Forest (RF) for LULC classification using Google Earth images from the years 2006, 2014, and 2022. The objective of this study is to evaluate and identify the best classifier for LULC classification and change detection. Four LULC categories (Built-up, Open area, Farmland, and Agroforestry) were identified. The evaluation criteria included overall accuracy, kappa coefficient, producer's accuracy, user's accuracy, computing time, algorithm stability, and visual quality. The results showed that the RF algorithm outperformed both SVM and ANN algorithms with an average overall accuracy of 0.97, kappa coefficient of 0.98, producer's accuracy of 0.99, and user's accuracy of 0.97, surpassing the accuracies achieved by SVM (0.96, 0.97, 0.98, and 0.97) and ANN (0.89, 0.81, 0.94, and 0.88), with corresponding computing times of 6.33, 15, and 30 s. All classifiers performed stably with different training sizes. Visual quality assessment revealed that RF had the highest precision. Consequently, the built-up change detection result shows, the net change in built-up area between 2006 and 2022 was increased by 0.</i>74 Km<sup>2</sup> <i>for ANN, 1.</i>74 Km2 <i>for SVM, and 1.</i>66 Km<sup>2</sup> <i>for RF. The comparison reveals that the RF algorithm showcasing high precision in detecting change, consistent with the data (increased by 1.</i>65 Km<sup>2</sup><i>) obtained from Dilla town land administration office. To validate the results, the study considered field surveys, reference images, local experts, and previous studies. Based on the findings, the study concludes that using RF classifier with an object-based approach is an effective way to map LULC and detect changes in the study area over time</i>. <i>Future researchers are recommended to utilize this effective algorithm for addressing LULC related problems in the study area.</i>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Heliyon
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39146
Citations
38
Primary Topic
Remote-Sensing Image Classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine learning for urban land use/ cover mapping: Comparison of artificial neural network, random forest and support vector machine, a case study of Dilla town

Melion Kasahun, Abiyot Legesse
38 citations
Heliyon
Remote-Sensing Image Classification
12.15
article

Machine learning for urban land use/ cover mapping: Comparison of artificial neural network, random forest and support vector machine, a case study of Dilla town

Melion Kasahun, Abiyot Legesse
article en
38 citations

Abstract

<h2>Abstract</h2> <i>The ability to accurately classify land use/cover (LULC) is critical for environmental monitoring and land use planning. This study compares three machine learning algorithms: Artificial Neural Network (ANN),</i> Support <i>Vector Machine (SVM), and Random Forest (RF) for LULC classification using Google Earth images from the years 2006, 2014, and 2022. The objective of this study is to evaluate and identify the best classifier for LULC classification and change detection. Four LULC categories (Built-up, Open area, Farmland, and Agroforestry) were identified. The evaluation criteria included overall accuracy, kappa coefficient, producer's accuracy, user's accuracy, computing time, algorithm stability, and visual quality. The results showed that the RF algorithm outperformed both SVM and ANN algorithms with an average overall accuracy of 0.97, kappa coefficient of 0.98, producer's accuracy of 0.99, and user's accuracy of 0.97, surpassing the accuracies achieved by SVM (0.96, 0.97, 0.98, and 0.97) and ANN (0.89, 0.81, 0.94, and 0.88), with corresponding computing times of 6.33, 15, and 30 s. All classifiers performed stably with different training sizes. Visual quality assessment revealed that RF had the highest precision. Consequently, the built-up change detection result shows, the net change in built-up area between 2006 and 2022 was increased by 0.</i>74 Km<sup>2</sup> <i>for ANN, 1.</i>74 Km2 <i>for SVM, and 1.</i>66 Km<sup>2</sup> <i>for RF. The comparison reveals that the RF algorithm showcasing high precision in detecting change, consistent with the data (increased by 1.</i>65 Km<sup>2</sup><i>) obtained from Dilla town land administration office. To validate the results, the study considered field surveys, reference images, local experts, and previous studies. Based on the findings, the study concludes that using RF classifier with an object-based approach is an effective way to map LULC and detect changes in the study area over time</i>. <i>Future researchers are recommended to utilize this effective algorithm for addressing LULC related problems in the study area.</i>

HeliyonVol. 10(20)
Dilla University (ET), BorgWarner (Brazil) (BR)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Remote-Sensing Image Classification
12.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.