Nitrogen input strategies impact fertilizer nitrogen saving by intercropping: A global meta-analysis

Several meta-analyses have demonstrated that intercropping increases land use efficiency and fertilizer use efficiency of grain-producing crop species, but no overarching synthesis has been made on the effects of fertilizer management on fertilizer use efficiency. Here we assess the relative N use efficiency of species mixtures compared to sole crops under different N input strategies using global data. We built a global database of yield and fertilizer N input with 600 data records representing the results of 136 independent experiments from 80 publications with four main types of species functional combinations (SFCs), based on key traits that were found relevant in previous intercropping studies: C3-cereal/legume, maize/legume, C4-non-maize/legume and maize/C3-cereal. We found that the literature reports results for four main N input strategies in the intercrop and sole crops: (1) zero fertilizer N input (N ic =N 1 =N 2 =0), (2) equal fertilizer N input (N ic =N 1 =N 2 >0), (3) intermediate fertilizer N input (N 1 ≥N ic ≥N 2 and N 1 >N 2 ), and (4) transgressive fertilizer N input (N ic >N 1 ≥N 2 ), where N 1 , N 2 and N ic represent the N input in sole crop 1, sole crop 2 and the intercrop. With zero N input, high land equivalent ratio was found in cereal/legume intercrops but not in maize/C3-cereal intercrops. Intermediate N input (strategy 3) resulted in high LER (land equivalent ratio) and FNER (fertilizer N equivalent ratio) because of the high intercropping advantage of cereals in C3-cereal/legume, maize/legume, and C4-non-maize/legume intercrops and maize in maize/C3-cereal intercrops. Equal N input in the sole crops and the intercrops resulted in LER and FNER being equal and N saving was entirely due to land saving, regardless of SFCs. Transgressive N input resulted in high LER but low FNER. The study confirms that cereal/legume intercropping increases LER at zero N input. Strategies that tailor N input in intercropping to species demand (strategy 3) pair high productivity and LER to high fertilizer N use efficiency. The transgressive N input strategy maximizes LER at the expense of FNER, thus potentially generating high N losses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Field Crops Research
Published
2024-10-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2024.109607
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.81

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nitrogen input strategies impact fertilizer nitrogen saving by intercropping: A global meta-analysis

Fusuo Zhang, T.J. Stomph, Wopke van der Werf, Yalin Liu et al.
12 citations
Field Crops Research
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
6.81
article

Nitrogen input strategies impact fertilizer nitrogen saving by intercropping: A global meta-analysis

Fusuo Zhang, T.J. Stomph, Wopke van der Werf, Yalin Liu, Chunjie Li
article en
12 citations

Abstract

Several meta-analyses have demonstrated that intercropping increases land use efficiency and fertilizer use efficiency of grain-producing crop species, but no overarching synthesis has been made on the effects of fertilizer management on fertilizer use efficiency. Here we assess the relative N use efficiency of species mixtures compared to sole crops under different N input strategies using global data. We built a global database of yield and fertilizer N input with 600 data records representing the results of 136 independent experiments from 80 publications with four main types of species functional combinations (SFCs), based on key traits that were found relevant in previous intercropping studies: C3-cereal/legume, maize/legume, C4-non-maize/legume and maize/C3-cereal. We found that the literature reports results for four main N input strategies in the intercrop and sole crops: (1) zero fertilizer N input (N ic =N 1 =N 2 =0), (2) equal fertilizer N input (N ic =N 1 =N 2 >0), (3) intermediate fertilizer N input (N 1 ≥N ic ≥N 2 and N 1 >N 2 ), and (4) transgressive fertilizer N input (N ic >N 1 ≥N 2 ), where N 1 , N 2 and N ic represent the N input in sole crop 1, sole crop 2 and the intercrop. With zero N input, high land equivalent ratio was found in cereal/legume intercrops but not in maize/C3-cereal intercrops. Intermediate N input (strategy 3) resulted in high LER (land equivalent ratio) and FNER (fertilizer N equivalent ratio) because of the high intercropping advantage of cereals in C3-cereal/legume, maize/legume, and C4-non-maize/legume intercrops and maize in maize/C3-cereal intercrops. Equal N input in the sole crops and the intercrops resulted in LER and FNER being equal and N saving was entirely due to land saving, regardless of SFCs. Transgressive N input resulted in high LER but low FNER. The study confirms that cereal/legume intercropping increases LER at zero N input. Strategies that tailor N input in intercropping to species demand (strategy 3) pair high productivity and LER to high fertilizer N use efficiency. The transgressive N input strategy maximizes LER at the expense of FNER, thus potentially generating high N losses.

Field Crops ResearchVol. 318
China Agricultural University (CN), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, China Agricultural University, China Scholarship Council, Hainan University
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
6.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.