The Qualitative Election Study of Britain Party Leader Evaluations Database, 2010–2019

The authors describe the Qualitative Election Study of Britain (qesb) Party Leader Evaluation Database, a database containing 4,119 words and phrases evaluating British political party leaders. The data were collected during pre-election focus groups and interviews with participants from England, Scotland, and Wales during the General Election campaigns of 2010, 2015, 2017, and 2019. A supplementary dataset of leaders’ evaluation data from Dundee residents after the Scottish Independence Referendum in 2014 is also provided. To collect the data, participants viewed headshot pictures of major and minor party leaders (depending on where in Britain they lived) taken from party websites. Participants wrote down words or phrases they associated with each leader and coded their assessment as positive, negative, or neutral. These data are suitable for content, sentiment, and discourse analysis or analytic generalization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Data Journal for the Humanities and Social Sciences
Published
2024-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/24523666-bja10049
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Qualitative Election Study of Britain Party Leader Evaluations Database, 2010–2019

Jan Reichelt, Thomas Oliver, Edzia Carvalho, Kristi Winters
1 links
Research Data Journal for the Humanities and Social Sciences
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
article

The Qualitative Election Study of Britain Party Leader Evaluations Database, 2010–2019

Jan Reichelt, Thomas Oliver, Edzia Carvalho, Kristi Winters
article en

Abstract

The authors describe the Qualitative Election Study of Britain (qesb) Party Leader Evaluation Database, a database containing 4,119 words and phrases evaluating British political party leaders. The data were collected during pre-election focus groups and interviews with participants from England, Scotland, and Wales during the General Election campaigns of 2010, 2015, 2017, and 2019. A supplementary dataset of leaders’ evaluation data from Dundee residents after the Scottish Independence Referendum in 2014 is also provided. To collect the data, participants viewed headshot pictures of major and minor party leaders (depending on where in Britain they lived) taken from party websites. Participants wrote down words or phrases they associated with each leader and coded their assessment as positive, negative, or neutral. These data are suitable for content, sentiment, and discourse analysis or analytic generalization.

Research Data Journal for the Humanities and Social SciencesVol. 9
University of Dundee (GB), University of the West of England (GB), GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences (DE)
University of Portsmouth, University of Bath, University of Bristol, Hong Kong Baptist University
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Qualitative Election Study of Britain Party Leader Evaluations Database, 2010–2019 — Jan Reichelt, Thomas Oliver, et al. · Research Data Journal for the Humanities and Social Sciences (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS