Bat box monitoring: comparing multiple contemporary methods

ABSTRACT Bat boxes can be employed to provide mitigation for the loss of trees with bat roost potential. Eighty bat boxes were deployed by the Hamilton City Council as part of the bat mitigation strategy for the Southern Links Project in southern Hamilton. Several contemporary methods were employed to determine bat box occupancy to ensure effective monitoring. This included visual scoring assessments (e.g. staining, wetness), endoscope surveys, thermal imaging, and eDNA. Emergence survey data were provided by the University of Waikato which provided further insight into the accuracy of the methods. Jointly the methods confirmed the use of 34 Kent style boxes ( n = 70; 49%). Indicating a high success rate of box utilisation over a relatively short period (two years). Of the methods, eDNA confirmed the largest percentage of bat box use. Comparatively, thermal imaging provided an alternative and less intrusive means of surveying on‐the‐day bat presence. However, there were instances where survey conditions (e.g. terrain, vegetation clutter, solar irradiance, rainfall) influenced the reliability of thermal imaging. While visual assessment and thermal imaging cannot be solely relied on, they provide a supportive tool for other monitoring techniques. They can help guide the application of more definitive methods such as eDNA.