Insights for sustainable business practices: Comparative impact of independent and corporate venture capital funding on financial and environmental performance

This study aims to analyze the effects of venture capital (VC) financing schemes on the financial and environmental performance of their VC-backed companies. This research leverages a dataset including 325 U.S. firms between 2002 and 2022 and examines two issues of interest: independent venture capital (IVC) and corporate venture capital (CVC) funding. The results show that IVC-backed companies have significantly better environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings and emit fewer greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions when compared to companies backed by CVC. This highlights that the function of IVC is to improve the environmental sustainability of businesses. Together this helps provide a valuable perspective about which VC models (CVC, IVC) does have an impact on how businesses pursue sustainability practices alongside financial performance. This paper contributes to the sustainable entrepreneurship literature by focusing on the importance of funding types with performing sustainable practices. This study aims to analyze the effects of venture capital (VC) financing schemes on the financial and environmental performance of their VC-backed companies. This research leverages a dataset including 325 U.S. firms between 2002 and 2022 and examines two issues of interest: independent venture capital (IVC) and corporate venture capital (CVC) funding. The results show that IVC-backed companies have significantly better environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings and emit fewer greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions when compared to companies backed by CVC. Also, the study results reveal that when compared to CVC backed companies, IVC-backed firms have a 22% superior ROE, 37% higher average in their ROA, and they also boasted of an average Tobin's Q with about 48%. This helps provide a valuable perspective about which VC models (CVC, IVC) does have an impact on how businesses pursue sustainability practices alongside financial performance. This paper contributes to the sustainable entrepreneurship literature by focusing on the importance of funding types with performing sustainable practices. • Analysis of 325 U.S. firms funded by IVC and CVC from 2002 to 2022. • IVC-backed companies exhibit superior ESG ratings compared to CVC-backed firms. • IVC-backed companies emit fewer GHG emissions than their CVC-backed counterparts. • Insights into how different VC models impact sustainability alongside financial performance. • Contribution to sustainable entrepreneurship literature by focusing on funding types and sustainable practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research in International Business and Finance
Published
2024-10-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102632
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Private Equity and Venture Capital
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Insights for sustainable business practices: Comparative impact of independent and corporate venture capital funding on financial and environmental performance

Fatima Shuwaikh, Emmanuelle Dubocage, Othman Alolah, Agathe Tanguy
9 citations
Research in International Business and Finance
Private Equity and Venture Capital
8.52
article

Insights for sustainable business practices: Comparative impact of independent and corporate venture capital funding on financial and environmental performance

Fatima Shuwaikh, Emmanuelle Dubocage, Othman Alolah, Agathe Tanguy
article en
9 citations

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effects of venture capital (VC) financing schemes on the financial and environmental performance of their VC-backed companies. This research leverages a dataset including 325 U.S. firms between 2002 and 2022 and examines two issues of interest: independent venture capital (IVC) and corporate venture capital (CVC) funding. The results show that IVC-backed companies have significantly better environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings and emit fewer greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions when compared to companies backed by CVC. This highlights that the function of IVC is to improve the environmental sustainability of businesses. Together this helps provide a valuable perspective about which VC models (CVC, IVC) does have an impact on how businesses pursue sustainability practices alongside financial performance. This paper contributes to the sustainable entrepreneurship literature by focusing on the importance of funding types with performing sustainable practices. This study aims to analyze the effects of venture capital (VC) financing schemes on the financial and environmental performance of their VC-backed companies. This research leverages a dataset including 325 U.S. firms between 2002 and 2022 and examines two issues of interest: independent venture capital (IVC) and corporate venture capital (CVC) funding. The results show that IVC-backed companies have significantly better environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings and emit fewer greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions when compared to companies backed by CVC. Also, the study results reveal that when compared to CVC backed companies, IVC-backed firms have a 22% superior ROE, 37% higher average in their ROA, and they also boasted of an average Tobin's Q with about 48%. This helps provide a valuable perspective about which VC models (CVC, IVC) does have an impact on how businesses pursue sustainability practices alongside financial performance. This paper contributes to the sustainable entrepreneurship literature by focusing on the importance of funding types with performing sustainable practices. • Analysis of 325 U.S. firms funded by IVC and CVC from 2002 to 2022. • IVC-backed companies exhibit superior ESG ratings compared to CVC-backed firms. • IVC-backed companies emit fewer GHG emissions than their CVC-backed counterparts. • Insights into how different VC models impact sustainability alongside financial performance. • Contribution to sustainable entrepreneurship literature by focusing on funding types and sustainable practices.

Research in International Business and FinanceVol. 73
Université Paris-Est Créteil (FR), Imam Mohammad ibn Saud Islamic University (SA), Universidade Católica Portuguesa (PT), Pôle Léonard de Vinci (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Private Equity and Venture Capital
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.