[Reference ranges and test-retest reliability of subject visual horizontal from different head-tilt angles in young healthy adults].

<b>Objective:</b>To establish the normal values of subjective visual horizontal(SVH) under different head tilt angles, analyze the test-retest reliability, and provide a normal value reference for the refined diagnosis and functional assessment of SVH in clinical vestibular disorders. <b>Methods:</b>Thirty-one healthy young people were selected to wear visual reality glasses to test SVH data in five different head tilt angles: upright head position 0°, head tilted 45°to the left(L45°), head tilted 45° to the right(R45°), head tilted 90° to the left(L90°), and head tilted 90° to the right(R90°), and were re-tested 2 weeks later. <b>Results:</b>①The normal values of SVH at 0°, L45°, R45°, L90°, and R90°were 0.30±1.32, 5.94±5.54, -11.44±5.32, -0.87±8.63, -2.70±8.02, respectively. ②The 95% confidence intervals of SVH at 0°, L45°, R45°, L90°, and R90° were: (-2.34,2.94),(-5.14,17.02),(-22.08,-0.80),(-18.13,16.39),(-18.74,13.34), respectively. The ratio of asymmetry in the absolute value of bilateral 45° deviation was 26.4% and the ratio of asymmetry in the absolute value of bilateral 90° deviation was 1.3%. ③The intra-class correlation coefficient(ICC) for 0°, L45°, R45°, L90° and R90° was 0.625, 0.641, 0.564, 0.769, 0.656, respectively. <b>Conclusion:</b>SVH has good test-retest reliability and high clinical test stability and stability. The data on normal values of SVH at different head tilt angles established in this study can provide clinical references for the refined diagnosis and functional assessment of vestibular system disorders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2024.10.013
Primary Topic
Infrared Thermography in Medicine
Type
article
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

[Reference ranges and test-retest reliability of subject visual horizontal from different head-tilt angles in young healthy adults].

Jiali Shen, Xiaobao Ma, Kuan He, Jin Sun et al.
PubMed
Infrared Thermography in Medicine
article

[Reference ranges and test-retest reliability of subject visual horizontal from different head-tilt angles in young healthy adults].

Jiali Shen, Xiaobao Ma, Kuan He, Jin Sun, Lu Wang, Yue Li, Wei Wang, Xiangping Chen, Jianyong Chen, Jun Yang
article en

Abstract

<b>Objective:</b>To establish the normal values of subjective visual horizontal(SVH) under different head tilt angles, analyze the test-retest reliability, and provide a normal value reference for the refined diagnosis and functional assessment of SVH in clinical vestibular disorders. <b>Methods:</b>Thirty-one healthy young people were selected to wear visual reality glasses to test SVH data in five different head tilt angles: upright head position 0°, head tilted 45°to the left(L45°), head tilted 45° to the right(R45°), head tilted 90° to the left(L90°), and head tilted 90° to the right(R90°), and were re-tested 2 weeks later. <b>Results:</b>①The normal values of SVH at 0°, L45°, R45°, L90°, and R90°were 0.30±1.32, 5.94±5.54, -11.44±5.32, -0.87±8.63, -2.70±8.02, respectively. ②The 95% confidence intervals of SVH at 0°, L45°, R45°, L90°, and R90° were: (-2.34,2.94),(-5.14,17.02),(-22.08,-0.80),(-18.13,16.39),(-18.74,13.34), respectively. The ratio of asymmetry in the absolute value of bilateral 45° deviation was 26.4% and the ratio of asymmetry in the absolute value of bilateral 90° deviation was 1.3%. ③The intra-class correlation coefficient(ICC) for 0°, L45°, R45°, L90° and R90° was 0.625, 0.641, 0.564, 0.769, 0.656, respectively. <b>Conclusion:</b>SVH has good test-retest reliability and high clinical test stability and stability. The data on normal values of SVH at different head tilt angles established in this study can provide clinical references for the refined diagnosis and functional assessment of vestibular system disorders.

PubMedVol. 38(10)
XinHua Hospital (CN)
Infrared Thermography in Medicine
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.