The effect of an ultra-brief intervention to challenge fat talk: examination of fat talk engagement, body dissatisfaction, and negative affect

Objective Conversations that denigrate body size and weight have become increasingly prevalent among young women, however, the factors contributing to participation in such ‘fat-talk’ are not yet fully understood. The present study sought to investigate how women respond to traditional fat-talk compared to dialogue inspired by feminist theory that actively challenges fat talk. This study incorporated experimental vignettes to facilitate this comparison.Method A sample of 92 undergraduate female students from the United Arab Emirates completed questionnaires to determine their baseline levels of body dissatisfaction, the extent of their engagement in fat-talk and their mood. Participants were then randomly assigned to one of two conditions, either exposure to a vignette that displayed engagement in fat talk or to one that illustrated a dialogue in which fat talk was challenged by using feminist-inspired statements.Results Post-exposure assessments measured engagement in fat-talk, negative affect, and the social likeability of the character, and revealed that post-exposure engagement in fat-talk was not significantly different between the two conditions, however, the social likeability of the character in the challenge vignette was reported to be higher. Baseline levels of fat-talk were found to be a significant predictor for engagement in fat-talk post-exposure.Conclusions These findings contribute to a nuanced understanding of how women perceive and engage in fat-talk, as well as the factors that may influence such engagement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cogent Psychology
Published
2024-10-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2024.2414614
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.64
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effect of an ultra-brief intervention to challenge fat talk: examination of fat talk engagement, body dissatisfaction, and negative affect

Wafa Jamilur Rehman, Zahir Vally
1 citations
Cogent Psychology
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
0.64
article

The effect of an ultra-brief intervention to challenge fat talk: examination of fat talk engagement, body dissatisfaction, and negative affect

Wafa Jamilur Rehman, Zahir Vally
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Objective Conversations that denigrate body size and weight have become increasingly prevalent among young women, however, the factors contributing to participation in such ‘fat-talk’ are not yet fully understood. The present study sought to investigate how women respond to traditional fat-talk compared to dialogue inspired by feminist theory that actively challenges fat talk. This study incorporated experimental vignettes to facilitate this comparison.Method A sample of 92 undergraduate female students from the United Arab Emirates completed questionnaires to determine their baseline levels of body dissatisfaction, the extent of their engagement in fat-talk and their mood. Participants were then randomly assigned to one of two conditions, either exposure to a vignette that displayed engagement in fat talk or to one that illustrated a dialogue in which fat talk was challenged by using feminist-inspired statements.Results Post-exposure assessments measured engagement in fat-talk, negative affect, and the social likeability of the character, and revealed that post-exposure engagement in fat-talk was not significantly different between the two conditions, however, the social likeability of the character in the challenge vignette was reported to be higher. Baseline levels of fat-talk were found to be a significant predictor for engagement in fat-talk post-exposure.Conclusions These findings contribute to a nuanced understanding of how women perceive and engage in fat-talk, as well as the factors that may influence such engagement.

Cogent PsychologyVol. 11(1)
United Arab Emirates University (AE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Eating Disorders and Behaviors
0.64
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.