Prediction of the height of caving zone above the undercut in block caving mining method

The block caving is one of the most commonly used methods in underground mining of massive, low/high grades, and deep deposits. As a result of undercutting, caving occurs and propagates toward the upper part of the ore block. It is essential to predict the height of caved ore and its volume based on shape of the caved zone to make an economic decision. This paper describes the mechanism of height of the caving zone development. Consequently, four new mathematical models (prismatic, parabolic, cubic, and hemispheric) are proposed to estimate the height of this caving zone. The results are compared with the existing approaches. The proposed methods have proven that the height of caving zone has a linear relationship with the uniaxial tensile and compressive strengths and the height of undercut as well. Also, the height of the caving zone has a negative exponential relationship with unit weight of undercut roof materials and its expansion factor. The Height of the caving zone of the prismatic model is 1.5 times higher than the parabolic model and 1.3 times higher than the hemispheric model. The cubic model estimates the lowest height of the caving zone (0.3 times the height estimated by the prismatic model). The average height of the caving zone, taking the average unit weight of 27 KN/m3 into account, is about 69.4 times the tensile strength, 5.8 times the uniaxial compressive strength of the rock mass, and 18.8 times the height of the undercut.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Rock mechanics letters.
Published
2024-10-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70425/rml.202401.5
Primary Topic
Geomechanics and Mining Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prediction of the height of caving zone above the undercut in block caving mining method

Abbas Majdi, E. Amini, Hassan Bakhshandeh Amnieh, Behnam Alipenhani
Rock mechanics letters.
Geomechanics and Mining Engineering
article

Prediction of the height of caving zone above the undercut in block caving mining method

Abbas Majdi, E. Amini, Hassan Bakhshandeh Amnieh, Behnam Alipenhani
article en

Abstract

The block caving is one of the most commonly used methods in underground mining of massive, low/high grades, and deep deposits. As a result of undercutting, caving occurs and propagates toward the upper part of the ore block. It is essential to predict the height of caved ore and its volume based on shape of the caved zone to make an economic decision. This paper describes the mechanism of height of the caving zone development. Consequently, four new mathematical models (prismatic, parabolic, cubic, and hemispheric) are proposed to estimate the height of this caving zone. The results are compared with the existing approaches. The proposed methods have proven that the height of caving zone has a linear relationship with the uniaxial tensile and compressive strengths and the height of undercut as well. Also, the height of the caving zone has a negative exponential relationship with unit weight of undercut roof materials and its expansion factor. The Height of the caving zone of the prismatic model is 1.5 times higher than the parabolic model and 1.3 times higher than the hemispheric model. The cubic model estimates the lowest height of the caving zone (0.3 times the height estimated by the prismatic model). The average height of the caving zone, taking the average unit weight of 27 KN/m3 into account, is about 69.4 times the tensile strength, 5.8 times the uniaxial compressive strength of the rock mass, and 18.8 times the height of the undercut.

Rock mechanics letters.Vol. 1(1)
University of Tehran (IR)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Geomechanics and Mining Engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.