Poultry slaughterhouse waste management through anaerobic digestion with varying proportions of chicken litter

• Effectiveness of co-digesting poultry slaughterhouse waste and chicken litter (CL). • Addition of CL as a co-substrate results in enhanced biogas production. • Slaughterhouse waste and CL ratio of 1:1 to 1:4 yield significant biogas. • Significance of proper waste blending, optimal feedstock ratios, and pH control. Nepal's burgeoning poultry industry which is a key sector in its economy leads to a considerable generation of slaughterhouse waste (SHW), necessitating effective and sustainable disposal methods. This study explores anaerobic digestion as an optimal solution for poultry SHW management, aiming to produce energy-rich biogas while efficiently mitigating pollution in these facilities. Particularly, the feasibility and effectiveness of co-digestion with chicken litter (CL) were investigated to enhance biogas production and waste utilization. Four distinct runs of anaerobic digestion were performed, each utilizing varying substrate compositions with SHW to CL ratios of 1:0, 4:1, 1:1, and 1:4. Throughout the process, essential parameters, including total solids (TS), volatile solids (VS), biological oxygen demand (BOD 5 ), pH, temperature, biogas generation, were meticulously measured. The cumulative biogas production for each run was as follows: 14.87 liters and a biogas yield of 88.73 ml/gVS with a 17.39% VS reduction for Run 1, 25.98 liters and a biogas yield of 147.21 ml/gVS with a 28.64% VS reduction for Run 2, 78.32 liters and a biogas yield of 314.69 ml/gVS with a 54.32% VS reduction for Run 3, and 89.195 liters and a biogas yield of 344.36 ml/gVS with a 63.05% VS reduction for Run 4. Notably, as the proportion of CL increased in the mixture from 4:1 to 1:1, a considerable VS reduction was observed. Furthermore, when the ratio of SHW to CL reached 1:1 and 1:4, a significant BOD 5 reduction of 50% and 63.13% was achieved, respectively, surpassing previous runs. The results reveal that the addition of CL in an appropriate ratio effectively manages poultry SHW, with the optimum SHW:CL ratio for significant biogas yield lying between 1:1 and 1:4.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Challenges
Published
2024-10-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2024.101035
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Poultry slaughterhouse waste management through anaerobic digestion with varying proportions of chicken litter

Tejendra Regmi, Ram Kumar Sharma, Ravi Nepal, Sushant Bist
3 citations
Environmental Challenges
Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
0.80
article

Poultry slaughterhouse waste management through anaerobic digestion with varying proportions of chicken litter

Tejendra Regmi, Ram Kumar Sharma, Ravi Nepal, Sushant Bist
article en
3 citations

Abstract

• Effectiveness of co-digesting poultry slaughterhouse waste and chicken litter (CL). • Addition of CL as a co-substrate results in enhanced biogas production. • Slaughterhouse waste and CL ratio of 1:1 to 1:4 yield significant biogas. • Significance of proper waste blending, optimal feedstock ratios, and pH control. Nepal's burgeoning poultry industry which is a key sector in its economy leads to a considerable generation of slaughterhouse waste (SHW), necessitating effective and sustainable disposal methods. This study explores anaerobic digestion as an optimal solution for poultry SHW management, aiming to produce energy-rich biogas while efficiently mitigating pollution in these facilities. Particularly, the feasibility and effectiveness of co-digestion with chicken litter (CL) were investigated to enhance biogas production and waste utilization. Four distinct runs of anaerobic digestion were performed, each utilizing varying substrate compositions with SHW to CL ratios of 1:0, 4:1, 1:1, and 1:4. Throughout the process, essential parameters, including total solids (TS), volatile solids (VS), biological oxygen demand (BOD 5 ), pH, temperature, biogas generation, were meticulously measured. The cumulative biogas production for each run was as follows: 14.87 liters and a biogas yield of 88.73 ml/gVS with a 17.39% VS reduction for Run 1, 25.98 liters and a biogas yield of 147.21 ml/gVS with a 28.64% VS reduction for Run 2, 78.32 liters and a biogas yield of 314.69 ml/gVS with a 54.32% VS reduction for Run 3, and 89.195 liters and a biogas yield of 344.36 ml/gVS with a 63.05% VS reduction for Run 4. Notably, as the proportion of CL increased in the mixture from 4:1 to 1:1, a considerable VS reduction was observed. Furthermore, when the ratio of SHW to CL reached 1:1 and 1:4, a significant BOD 5 reduction of 50% and 63.13% was achieved, respectively, surpassing previous runs. The results reveal that the addition of CL in an appropriate ratio effectively manages poultry SHW, with the optimum SHW:CL ratio for significant biogas yield lying between 1:1 and 1:4.

Environmental ChallengesVol. 17
Tribhuvan University (NP), Ministry of Water Resources and Irrigation (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
0.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.